Chapter 31
Complicated Grief and Anniversary Grief
Linda had not opened her husband’s closet in two years.
His shirts still hung in order — work shirts on the left, the blue button-down she had bought him for their fortieth anniversary in the middle, the soft flannel he wore on Saturdays on the right. His shoes still sat on the rack by the door. His coffee mug — the chipped one from the trip to Branson — still sat on the kitchen counter where he had left it the morning he died.
His place setting was still on the dinner table. Linda sat across from it every evening and stared at the empty chair.
She had lost twenty pounds. She no longer worked. She no longer attended church. Her sister called twice a week and got a voicemail. Her grown daughter stopped by on Sundays and found her mother in the same bathrobe she had worn the Sunday before, and the Sunday before that.
Two years out, Linda was not “getting better with time.” She was getting worse. Time had not healed; it had compounded.
When her sister finally called Pastor David and said, “I’m scared we’re losing her,” the pastor heard the gentle terror in her voice and recognized it. He had seen this before. Most grief, in time, finds its way to a new place. Some grief gets stuck.
This chapter is for those who are stuck — and for those who love them and do not know how to help.
Chapter Thesis: Most grief follows a long, winding, but recognizable path. Some grief does not. When grief becomes stuck — persistent yearning, identity disruption, numbing, avoidance, withdrawal — persisting beyond a year and impairing daily life, what mental health researchers now call Prolonged Grief Disorder may be at work. This chapter helps the bereaved, their families, and their pastors recognize the difference between long grief (which is normal and may last a lifetime), anniversary grief (which is normal and may spike for decades), and complicated grief (which is treatable and should not be carried alone).
The first thing to say plainly: grief takes a long time. Much longer than our culture pretends. Much longer than most churches plan for. Most well-meaning Christians underestimate the timeline of normal grief by years.
If you are six months out, or a year out, or two years out — and you are still grieving, still crying, still aching at the empty chair — you are not broken. You are not weak in faith. You are not failing to trust God. You are grieving. And grief is the right response to losing someone you loved deeply. C. S. Lewis, who knew this terrain firsthand after his wife’s death, described grief as a long, winding valley where every bend reveals a new landscape.1 Some of those bends come years after the death.
Normal long grief has a shape. The pain may not lessen evenly. It often gets harder before it gets gentler. There are setbacks. Researchers have documented that for many bereaved, the second year is harder than the first — the numbness has lifted, reality has fully landed, and the world has moved on while the bereaved has not.2 Grief intensity can spike at anniversaries, birthdays, and holidays for decades. None of that is broken.
But sometimes grief does become broken. Sometimes it stops doing its slow, quiet work and starts consuming the bereaved instead. Mental health researchers have a name for this: complicated grief, now formalized in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders as Prolonged Grief Disorder.3 The criteria, simply put: persistent yearning and preoccupation with the deceased; identity disruption (“I do not know who I am without him”); avoidance of all reminders or, conversely, total preoccupation with all reminders; emotional numbness; intense loneliness; inability to engage in normal life — all present twelve months or more after the death, severe enough to impair daily functioning.4
I do not love the medical language. Grief is not a disease. The bereaved are not ill. But the diagnostic language can serve a real purpose: it tells pastors, families, and the bereaved themselves when grief has crossed from long to stuck. And it points toward help.
What complicated grief is not: it is not slow grief. It is not deep grief. It is not the bereaved who still cries at her husband’s grave on the anniversary. Most grief is long, deep, and wrenching — and that is healthy grief.5 Researchers like George Bonanno have shown that resilient grief and prolonged grief are both common patterns; neither is a moral category.6
What complicated grief is: grief that has stopped moving. Grief that consumes the bereaved instead of being carried by them. Grief that has shut down a life rather than reshaping a life.
Researchers have identified consistent risk factors for complicated grief.7 No single factor causes it. But the more risk factors stack up, the more likely a bereavement will turn into complicated grief.
The most common risks: Sudden or traumatic death. A death without warning — a car accident, a heart attack, an unexpected stroke — leaves the bereaved without time to brace. The shock can take years to work through. (We treat this more fully in Chapter 16.) Suicide loss. The bereaved after a suicide carry not just grief but trauma, shame, anger, and a layered “why” that never resolves cleanly. Suicide bereavement carries the highest rates of complicated grief of any death. (Chapter 15.) Child loss. The death of a child — at any age, in any circumstance — is one of the most lethal losses a parent will ever face. The grief is not simply “harder than other grief”; it is differently shaped, and it lasts a lifetime. (Chapter 14.) Pre-existing depression, anxiety, or trauma history. Grief grafts onto whatever was already there. A bereaved person already struggling with depression is at far higher risk. Isolation. The bereaved without strong community is at far higher risk. This is one reason the church’s failure of long grief care (which we treat in Chapter 32) is not just neglect but actual danger. Specific guilt or unfinished business. The widow who fought with her husband the morning he died and never got to apologize. The son who had not called his father in months when the call came. The daughter who was not at the bedside. Specific, unhealed guilt anchors grief to the past.
If you are reading this and recognizing your own situation in several of these categories, please hear me: this is not a moral failure. This is not weak faith. This is the burden of love compounded by particular hard circumstances. You are carrying something heavy. You may need help carrying it.
How do you know — as a pastor, a friend, a sibling, an adult child — whether the grief you are watching has become complicated? The flags clinicians and pastoral counselors watch for, twelve months or more after the death, are clear and worth memorizing.
Pastoral Red Flags for Complicated Grief (12+ months after the death):
• Persistent inability to function in daily life (work, parenting, basic self-care).
• Persistent intense yearning that does not soften over time.
• Total avoidance of all reminders or total preoccupation with all reminders.
• Major weight loss or gain.
• Severe sleep disruption that has not improved.
• Withdrawal from all relationships and activities.
• Substance use to numb or sleep.
• Suicidal thoughts.
• Refusal to engage with a future — no plans, no goals, no hope.
One or two of these for a season is normal grief. Several together, persisting at twelve months or beyond, is the picture of complicated grief and warrants trauma-informed help.
I want to underline one item from that list: suicidal thoughts. The bereaved sometimes long to be with the loved one who has died. A wistful, tearful “I just wish I could be with him” is often normal grief speaking. But when those thoughts become specific — when the bereaved is making plans, giving away possessions, withdrawing from all care — this is a crisis, and it needs immediate response. Call. Show up. Get the bereaved to professional help today. Do not wait. (Chapter 15 develops the suicide-related dimensions of this further.)
Now I want to pause and draw a careful line, because pastors and families confuse this all the time.
Not every painful, lingering grief is complicated grief. There is a separate, normal phenomenon that is often misread as pathology: anniversary grief.
Anniversary grief is the predictable spike in grief intensity that happens around dates, seasons, and milestones connected to the deceased. The first birthday after the death. The first death anniversary. The first Christmas. The first Mother’s Day. The wedding anniversary. The grandchild’s birthday the deceased never met. The smell of the lilacs that bloomed the week of the funeral.
Researchers, clinicians, and pastors all observe this rhythm.8 It is not pathology. It is the normal rhythm of long grief — a reminder that love has a calendar. The dates do not lessen the love; they reanimate it.
Anniversary grief does not stop at year one. The widow of fifty years still feels the ache on October 12. The mother of an adult son who died in his twenties still weeps on what would have been his fortieth birthday. The brother of a sister who died in childhood still pauses on her birthday at sixty-three. This is not stuckness. This is faithfulness. This is what real love looks like over time.
I have known pastors who, watching a bereaved member weep on the second anniversary of a death, gently suggested counseling. They mistook a normal anniversary spike for complicated grief. The bereaved member felt judged for grieving — felt told that her love had become a problem. The result was shame on top of sorrow. Pastoral harm done with pastoral intent.
The distinction between anniversary grief and complicated grief is this: anniversary grief is episodic. It comes and goes around dates. Between the dates, the bereaved is functioning, engaged, slowly rebuilding a life. Complicated grief is constant. The bereaved is not functioning between the dates either. The grief is not episodic; it is the new air she breathes.
That distinction matters because conflating the two causes pastoral harm in opposite directions. A pastor who treats anniversary grief as complicated grief shames the bereaved for normal love. A pastor who treats complicated grief as anniversary grief misses a person who needs help.
For the bereaved experiencing anniversary grief: know that you are not crazy, not broken, not behind some imaginary schedule. You are loving someone across time. The dates will hurt. They are supposed to hurt. The hurt is part of the love.
For pastors and friends: mark the dates. Put them on your calendar. Set automatic reminders.
The death anniversary. Reach out the day before, the day of, and the day after. A handwritten note. A phone call. A specific text: “I am thinking of John today. I am thinking of you.” The deceased’s birthday. The same. The first Christmas. The first Easter. Mother’s Day if the deceased was a mother. Father’s Day if the deceased was a father. The wedding anniversary. The deceased child’s graduation date if the child was school-aged.
Honor the small rituals the bereaved has created. Some bereaved visit the grave on dates; offer to go with them, or at least let them know you remember. Some light a candle in their home; ask if they would like company. Some host a meal in honor; come if invited. Some prefer solitude; respect that.
The deepest pastoral act on these dates is also the simplest one: speak the deceased’s name. Many bereaved people tell me that as the years pass, no one says their loved one’s name anymore. The deceased becomes a silence. The bereaved feels a double loss — the loss of the loved one, and the loss of permission to remember the loved one out loud, in conversation, with friends, in the church foyer.9
So: say the name. “I was thinking about Tom last week.” “I miss your dad’s laugh.” “I remember how Sarah used to sing in the choir.” These small acts are not painful for the bereaved. They are gifts. The bereaved already remembers. Your remembering with them is medicine.
Let me say this plainly and without embarrassment, because Christians sometimes hear it as if it were a betrayal of faith: when grief becomes complicated, get help.
Pastoral care is real care. Prayer is real prayer. Scripture is real medicine. But complicated grief, like a deep physical wound, often needs more than rest and time. It needs trauma-informed help, the same way a broken leg needs a setting and a cast.
What kinds of help? Licensed grief counselors. Therapists trained specifically in bereavement. Complicated Grief Therapy (CGT). A specific evidence-based protocol developed by M. Katherine Shear and colleagues, designed for prolonged grief disorder. CGT integrates cognitive-behavioral techniques with structured exposure to grief and gentle re-engagement with life. The outcomes in randomized trials are good. It works.10 Trauma-informed therapy. When the death involved trauma — suicide, sudden death, a death witnessed firsthand — trauma-focused approaches like EMDR or prolonged exposure can address the trauma layer that traditional grief work cannot reach. Psychiatric evaluation. When complicated grief is layered with major depression, severe sleep disturbance, or panic attacks, medication evaluation is appropriate. Antidepressants are not a sign of failed faith. Insulin is not a sign of failed faith for a diabetic. The brain has chemistry, and sometimes the chemistry needs help. Support groups. GriefShare, Compassionate Friends (for child loss), survivor-of-suicide groups, and complicated-grief peer support all exist. Many are free. Many are run by churches.
To pastors: build a list. Now. Before you need it. Find Christian-friendly therapists in your area who specialize in grief and trauma. Visit them. Vet them. Build relationships. When the call comes from the grieving family at 9:00 p.m. on a Tuesday, you will not have time to research providers. Have the list ready.
To the bereaved: if you are reading this and recognizing yourself, please ask for help. Your asking is not weakness. It is courage. It is exactly what the body of Christ is for. “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (Galatians 6:2). Your church is meant to bear this with you, and a counselor is one of the ways the church can.
I want to close with the most important sentence in this chapter: complicated grief is not life imprisonment.
With appropriate care, complicated grief lifts. The widow stuck at twenty-four months can, by month thirty-six, be opening the closet, eating with friends, returning to church, even laughing again. Not because she has stopped loving her husband. Because she has rejoined the world while still loving him.11
This is what good grief therapy aims for. Not “getting over it” — that is a category mistake. Not forgetting. Not cheerful pretending. Reintegration: re-entering life carrying the love. The relationship has changed; it has not ended (Chapter 24 develops this more fully). Resurrection is coming (Chapter 33). We will see them again (Chapter 34). The grief we carry today is real. It is also, in light of the empty tomb, not the final word.
Psalm 88 is the darkest psalm in the Bible. It ends — and this is striking — without resolution. The psalmist cries, “You have caused my beloved and my friend to shun me; my companions have become darkness” (Psalm 88:18, ESV). And the psalm simply stops. No sunrise. No deliverance. Just the dark, and the prayer that names the dark.
And yet Psalm 88 sits in the Bible. It is canon. The dark psalm is included. Which means: the lament has a place in the household of God.12 The complicated grief sufferer is not exiled from the church when she cannot find joy. She is in good company. The psalmist is grieving with her. So is the One to whom the psalmist prayed. Jesus wept at Lazarus’s tomb (John 11:35). He wept though He knew the resurrection was coming. He weeps with you, too.13
If you are in the long valley today, I do not promise that it will lift tomorrow. I promise this: you are not alone. There is help. The Lord weeps with you. The church is meant to walk with you. Reach for the hand.
1. What does grief look like in your life right now? Are there areas where it feels stuck, and other areas where it feels like it is slowly reshaping you?
2. Have you been told (by yourself or others) that you should be over this by now? What would be true to say back to that voice?
3. Are there dates, seasons, or rooms in your home that you avoid? What might it look like, gently and slowly, to return to one?
4. Who in your life still says your loved one’s name? Who has stopped? What does it feel like when the name is spoken?
5. When was the last time you allowed yourself to grieve openly with another person? What stopped you, or what made it possible?
6. If a friend came to you describing the symptoms in this chapter, what would you tell her? What might it look like to tell yourself the same?
7. What would it mean — what would it cost — to ask for trained help? What would it cost not to?
Three observations frame this chapter’s pastoral work.
First, most pastors are trained well in funerals and almost not at all in long grief care. Complicated grief especially is foreign territory for many seminary graduates. This is not a failure of pastoral character; it is a gap in pastoral training. Filling the gap is itself part of pastoral love. Read Bonanno’s The Other Side of Sadness. Read Neimeyer. Sit with a licensed grief counselor for an hour and ask them what they wish pastors knew. The investment will repay you many times over in the lives of the bereaved you serve.14
Second, pastors sometimes mistake complicated grief for a spiritual problem and treat it spiritually alone. They prescribe more Bible reading, more prayer, more church attendance. They mean well. But asking a person with prolonged grief disorder to “trust God more” can produce shame on top of grief. The right pastoral response is not less Bible and less prayer — it is Bible and prayer plus the trauma-informed help God has provided through skilled counselors. Tim Keller writes that suffering Christians need both deep theological substance and concrete practical help; the two are not in competition.15
Third, anniversary blindness is one of the most common pastoral failures. Pastors miss anniversaries. Build a calendar of every death in your congregation in the past five years. Trigger automatic outreach at one week, one month, six months, one year, eighteen months, and two years — and on every death anniversary, every birthday of the deceased, and the first holiday season. Chapter 32 develops this calendar at length.
What to say when you suspect complicated grief: “I am worried about you. I think you are carrying something heavier than any one person should carry alone. I would like to help you find someone trained specifically in this kind of grief. I will go with you to the first appointment if that helps.” The combination — naming your concern, naming the option of trained help, offering your presence in the asking — communicates love and competence.
What NOT to say: “It has been two years; you should be over this by now” (false and damaging). “Just trust God more” (spiritual bypass; produces shame). “The Bible says we should not grieve as those without hope” (a misuse of 1 Thessalonians 4:13; Paul says we should not grieve as those without hope; he does not say we should not grieve. Hopeful grief is still grief). “Other people have lost loved ones too” (comparison wounds). “She would not want you to be like this” (no human knows what the deceased would want; this often substitutes the speaker’s wishes for the deceased’s).
Watch-outs: Take any expression of suicidal thinking seriously. Ask directly: “Are you having thoughts of ending your life?” Asking does not plant the thought; it opens the door. If the answer is yes, get the bereaved to a hospital or to a crisis line today. Watch also for substance use; alcohol use as self-medication is common in complicated grief and can mask the worsening. Ask gently. Ask repeatedly.
Next steps: Build the referral list of grief counselors and trauma-informed therapists in your area before you need it. Build a culture in your church that does not treat complicated grief as failed faith. Teach it from the pulpit. Mention it in pastoral prayers. Normalize the asking. Long after the funeral, the bereaved should feel that the church has not forgotten — and that the church understands grief sometimes needs more than the church alone can give.16
George A. Bonanno, The Other Side of Sadness: What the New Science of Bereavement Tells Us About Life After Loss. Research-based, accessible introduction to grief patterns and the difference between common and complicated bereavement.
Robert A. Neimeyer, Lessons of Loss: A Guide to Coping. Meaning-reconstruction approach to grief from a leading clinician; gentle and pastoral in tone.
Alan D. Wolfelt, Understanding Your Grief. Pastoral, gentle, broadly helpful for normal long grief; widely used in churches.
M. Katherine Shear’s published work on Complicated Grief Therapy (peer-reviewed journal articles). Scholarly but worth tracking down for pastors who want the clinical foundation of evidence-based treatment for prolonged grief disorder.
Jerry Sittser, A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows Through Loss. Christian reflection on long, deep grief from a man who lost wife, mother, and daughter in a single accident.
GriefShare materials (griefshare.org). Christian, peer-led grief support, widely available, with a structured 13-week curriculum that can run year-round in any church.
1 C. S. Lewis, A Grief Observed (New York: HarperOne, 1961), 60. ↩
2 George A. Bonanno, The Other Side of Sadness: What the New Science of Bereavement Tells Us About Life After Loss (New York: Basic Books, 2009), 86–88. Bonanno’s research challenges some popular “stages” models but confirms that for a meaningful subset of the bereaved, the second year is more difficult than the first. ↩
3 American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed., text rev. (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2022), 322–24. Prolonged Grief Disorder was added as a formal diagnosis in DSM-5-TR (2022), reflecting decades of research by Holly Prigerson, M. Katherine Shear, and colleagues. ↩
4 APA, DSM-5-TR, 322. The 12-month threshold (versus 6 months in some earlier proposals and in the ICD-11) is a deliberate clinical conservatism: the framers wanted to avoid pathologizing the broad range of normal long grief. ↩
5 Robert A. Neimeyer, Lessons of Loss: A Guide to Coping (Memphis: Center for the Study of Loss and Transition, 2002), 90. Neimeyer’s “meaning reconstruction” framework emphasizes the wide variety of normal grief responses and warns against medicalizing what is, for most, a long but healthy process. ↩
6 Bonanno, The Other Side of Sadness, 6–8. Bonanno documents resilience as the most common pattern of grief, with prolonged grief affecting roughly 10–15 percent of bereaved persons under typical conditions, and substantially higher percentages in high-risk circumstances. ↩
7 Holly G. Prigerson et al., “Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11,” PLoS Medicine 6, no. 8 (2009): e1000121, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121. Prigerson’s work, more than any other single body of research, established the empirical foundation for the eventual DSM-5-TR diagnosis. ↩
8 Bonanno, The Other Side of Sadness, 144–47. See also Alan D. Wolfelt, Understanding Your Grief: Ten Essential Touchstones for Finding Hope and Healing Your Heart (Fort Collins, CO: Companion Press, 2004), 28–30, on the recurrence of grief at significant dates as normal and lifelong. ↩
9 Wolfelt, Understanding Your Grief, 142. Wolfelt makes the practice of speaking the deceased’s name a central pastoral discipline, naming silence about the deceased as one of the most common and most damaging features of contemporary grief experience. ↩
10 M. Katherine Shear, Ellen Frank, Patricia R. Houck, and Charles F. Reynolds III, “Treatment of Complicated Grief: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” JAMA 293, no. 21 (2005): 2601–8, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2601. The original randomized controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of Complicated Grief Therapy. Subsequent trials have replicated and extended the findings. ↩
11 Jerry Sittser, A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows Through Loss, 20th anniv. ed. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2021), 40–42. Sittser’s reflection on grief as transformation rather than mere recovery is one of the most pastorally helpful Christian framings available. ↩
12 See Walter Brueggemann, The Message of the Psalms: A Theological Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984), 78–81, on Psalm 88 as the canonical license for Christian lament. The presence of an unresolved lament in the Psalter is itself a theological statement. ↩
13 Nancy Guthrie, Holding On to Hope: A Pathway Through Suffering to the Heart of God (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2002), 42–45. Guthrie’s reflection on Jesus weeping at Lazarus’s tomb — even though He knew the resurrection was minutes away — is one of the great pastoral readings of John 11. ↩
14 Bonanno, The Other Side of Sadness, esp. chaps. 1–3; Neimeyer, Lessons of Loss, esp. chaps. 4–6. Both volumes are accessible to non-clinicians and equip pastors to recognize the distinction between resilient grief, chronic grief, and prolonged grief disorder. ↩
15 Timothy Keller, Walking with God Through Pain and Suffering (New York: Dutton, 2013), 235–38. Keller is helpful here precisely because he refuses to pit theological depth against practical care; the suffering Christian needs both, and Christian pastoral practice has historically offered both. ↩
16 On the broader pastoral framework into which this chapter fits, see John Burke, Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God’s Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2015), chap. 1, on the central role of substantive Christian hope in equipping believers to walk through grief without being destroyed by it; and J. Steve Miller, Is Christianity Compatible with Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? (Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2022), chap. 4, “The Surprising Presence of Jesus,” on the pastoral significance of Christ’s nearness to those who suffer loss. ↩
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed., text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2022.
Bonanno, George A. The Other Side of Sadness: What the New Science of Bereavement Tells Us About Life After Loss. New York: Basic Books, 2009.
Brueggemann, Walter. The Message of the Psalms: A Theological Commentary. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984.
Burke, John. Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God’s Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2015.
Guthrie, Nancy. Holding On to Hope: A Pathway Through Suffering to the Heart of God. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2002.
Keller, Timothy. Walking with God Through Pain and Suffering. New York: Dutton, 2013.
Lewis, C. S. A Grief Observed. New York: HarperOne, 1961.
Miller, J. Steve. Is Christianity Compatible with Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2022.
Neimeyer, Robert A. Lessons of Loss: A Guide to Coping. Memphis: Center for the Study of Loss and Transition, 2002.
Prigerson, Holly G., et al. “Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11.” PLoS Medicine 6, no. 8 (2009): e1000121.
Shear, M. Katherine, Ellen Frank, Patricia R. Houck, and Charles F. Reynolds III. “Treatment of Complicated Grief: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” JAMA 293, no. 21 (2005): 2601–8.
Sittser, Jerry. A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows Through Loss. 20th anniv. ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2021.
Wolfelt, Alan D. Understanding Your Grief: Ten Essential Touchstones for Finding Hope and Healing Your Heart. Fort Collins, CO: Companion Press, 2004.