Chapter 23
Sensing the Presence of the Deceased
Linda had not been back to the house since the funeral. Six months had passed. Her mother's small bungalow on Maple Street still belonged to the family. Someone had to clean it out, sort the closets, decide about the dishes. So one Saturday morning, Linda took a deep breath, turned the key, and stepped inside.
She froze in the front hall.
Her mother was there.
Linda did not see her. She did not hear a voice. There was no apparition, no breeze, no creaking floorboard. There was only a quiet, settled, absolutely certain knowing. Mom is in this house. Linda stood there for a long minute, holding her keys. Then she did something she had not planned. She said out loud, "Hi, Mom." And she felt — not heard, but felt — something like a smile in the room.
She left without packing a single box.
That night Linda called her pastor. She was crying before he even said hello. "I don't know what's wrong with me," she said. "I think I'm losing it. I went to Mom's house and I felt her there. Like, really there. I'm a Christian. I know better. Was that demonic? Was I imagining it? Was it real? Pastor, please — am I going crazy?"
Her pastor took a breath before he answered. He had walked with hundreds of grieving people over thirty years, and he had heard this exact story dozens of times. He had also been trained to dismiss it. He had spent the last decade unlearning that training.
"Linda," he said gently, "you are not going crazy. What happened to you is one of the most ordinary experiences in grief. Let me tell you what we know."
Chapter Thesis: The most common experience the bereaved have of their loved ones is also the simplest: a quiet sense of presence, without sight, without sound, just a knowing. Grief researchers have documented this for half a century. Most pastors have never been told it exists. This chapter helps the bereaved name what they have felt without fear, without shame, and without overinterpreting it. Sensed presence is normal. It is, for most Christians, a tender gift held in trust. And held with discernment, it sits comfortably inside the long Christian conviction that love does not stop when breath stops.
Let's start with a careful definition. A "sensed presence" is the bereaved person's experience of feeling the deceased's presence — without seeing them, without hearing a voice, without any specific sensory perception you could point to. There is no apparition. There is no audible word. There is just a knowing. The widow walks into the bedroom and knows, with quiet certainty, that her husband is there. The son sits at his father's grave and knows his father is near him. The daughter steps into her mother's empty house and freezes in the hall.1
This is different from the fuller after-death communications we explored in Chapter 22. Those experiences usually involve something specific — a vision, a voice, a touch, a vivid dream. Sensed presence is quieter. It is the most common form of bereavement experience, and it is also the easiest to dismiss. There is nothing to point at. There is only the bereaved person's report: I knew she was there.
Researchers in the 1970s stumbled onto this phenomenon almost by accident. The famous Harvard Bereavement Study, published as The First Year of Bereavement by Glick, Weiss, and Parkes, did not set out to study sensed presence at all. The interviewers were asking widows about their grief, and the widows kept volunteering something the researchers had not asked about. They kept saying their husbands were still around. Forty-seven percent of the sample, when finally asked directly, agreed with the statement, "I have the feeling that my husband watches over me."2 The researchers had not anticipated this. They scrambled to make sense of it. To their credit, they finally concluded that this experience was not a sign of psychological illness. It was a normal — even healthy — part of the grief process.3
Far more common than most pastors realize. The British psychiatrist W. Dewi Rees published a landmark 1971 study in the British Medical Journal showing that thirty-nine percent of widows and widowers continued to report sensed presence experiences years after their bereavement.4 The Harvard study found similar numbers, and noted something striking: most other features of grief faded with time, but sensed presence did not. It seemed to take a few weeks to settle in, and then it stayed.5
More recent research confirms and extends these findings. Jenny Streit-Horn's careful 2011 dissertation reviewed forty-nine major studies on after-death communication, drawing data from over fifty thousand participants in twenty-four countries. Her conclusion: roughly thirty to thirty-five percent of people in the general population report at least one such experience over a lifetime, and among the recently bereaved, the figure climbs to eighty to eighty-five percent in the first year.6 The sensed-presence subset alone — the simplest form — typically lands somewhere between thirty and sixty percent of bereaved persons in the first year of grief.7
Read those numbers slowly. If you have felt your loved one's presence since they died, you are not unusual. You are not unstable. You are not a special case. You are joining roughly half of the bereaved persons in the world.
And yet most of us never hear about it. Why? Because the bereaved are afraid to say it out loud. The Harvard team noticed this immediately: widows whispered about these experiences as if confessing a sin. One study reported that more than half of those who had such experiences had never told a single person before the researchers asked.8 A 1996 study of women who had lost their fathers found that many feared being thought "psycho," "fruity," "ready for the loony bin," or "just plain weird."9 They could feel the presence. They just could not afford to mention it.
This silence has a cost. It leaves grieving Christians thinking they are alone, thinking they are losing their minds, thinking the experience is something dark or shameful. It is none of those things.
What the Research Shows. Across half a century of bereavement studies — from the Harvard Bereavement Study to Rees's British Medical Journal work to the Continuing Bonds volume to Streit-Horn's systematic review — sensed presence is documented as one of the most common, most normal, and most healthy features of the grief process. It is not a sign of mental illness. It is not unique. It does not generally indicate complicated grief. It is simply what bereaved human beings, in great numbers, experience.
Here we move from research to interpretation. What is actually happening when a bereaved Christian feels her mother in the kitchen? Scripture does not give a single, tidy answer. So we have to be humble. Several explanations may all be true, in different proportions, in different cases. I will name four.
First, the Holy Spirit's comfort, perceived in personal terms. Jesus promised the Holy Spirit as our Comforter (John 14:16–18, 26). The Spirit is a real Person, and He often comforts the bereaved Christian by drawing close in moments of grief. If a widow has spent fifty years sharing every joy and sorrow with her husband, the Spirit's comforting presence may register, to her, as feeling her husband near. The presence of God is real; the husband is associated with it in her heart. This is not delusion. It is the Comforter doing what He has always done, in a form that fits her shaped-by-marriage soul.
Second, the lingering imprint of love in significant places. A house your mother lived in for fifty years is full of her. Her hands chose the curtains. Her cooking smells live in the walls. Her voice still echoes in the rooms. When you walk in, your memory and your senses cooperate to produce a vivid, embodied recollection of her. This is a real experience, and it can feel like presence even when no presence is actively given. The brain is doing what brains do. That does not make the experience meaningless. Memory is a gift, and grief uses it.
Third, a real visitation permitted by God. Scripture is not silent on the possibility that God allows the dead, on rare occasions, to make some kind of contact with the living. Moses and Elijah appear at the Transfiguration (Matthew 17:1–8). Samuel appears in 1 Samuel 28, against expectation. The biblical line is firm against the living seeking the dead (Deuteronomy 18:10–12) — a matter we treat carefully in Chapter 25. But Scripture is more open to the possibility that God, in His sovereign kindness, may sometimes allow a moment of veil-permeability that the living do not seek. Some sensed-presence experiences may be such moments. We should not insist on this. We should also not rule it out.10
Fourth, the persistent reality of love that does not vanish at death. Christians have always believed that love between believers is a real bond that death does not sever. Romans 14:9 tells us Christ is "Lord both of the dead and of the living." Hebrews 12:23 speaks of "the spirits of the righteous made perfect" — real persons, alive with Christ, fully part of the life of the people of God.11 If your mother is alive in Christ, and you are alive in Christ, then there is a sense in which you are still members of the same family — the same body — separated only by the veil. Sensed presence may sometimes be the felt reality of that membership. We are bound across the veil because Christ is Lord of both sides of it.
Notice that I have offered four interpretations and have not chosen between them. That is intentional. I do not know which one applies in any given case. Often, more than one applies at once. Humility is not weakness here — it is honesty.
Let me say more about the fourth interpretation, because it matters most theologically. The historic Christian creeds confess "the communion of saints." That confession means something. It means the church is one — not just on earth, but across the veil. The believers who have died and the believers still living are members of the same body. We approach in worship, the writer of Hebrews tells us, "Mount Zion and the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem" — and there, gathered with the angels and with God Himself, are "the spirits of the righteous made perfect" (Hebrews 12:22–23). They are not asleep. They are not absent. They are there, alive and aware, part of the same gathered people of God we belong to.12
The fuller treatment of the cloud of witnesses (Hebrews 12:1) belongs to the next chapter, on continuing bonds. For our purposes here, the simple claim is enough: the church's life is bound across the veil. Your mother in Christ is more truly present to the body of Christ than she ever was when she was sitting next to you in the pew, because she is now perfected and home with the Lord.
This does not mean every sensed-presence experience is a special visitation. It does mean that sensed-presence experiences, biblically held, do not contradict Christian faith. They are consistent with — though they do not require — a robust theology of the communion of saints. When Linda walked into her mother's house and felt her mother there, she was not betraying her Christianity. She was, perhaps, brushing up against one of its oldest truths.
Most reported sensed-presence experiences are deeply comforting. The bereaved describe peace, gentle love, reassurance, a sense that the loved one is "okay." A 1996 study of bereaved daughters found that seventy percent of those who reported continuing attachment to their deceased fathers said the felt presence was welcome and supportive — even when, at first, it had startled them.13 A study of Boston widows reported that ten of ten participants experienced sensed presence at least once, that the experiences were "transformative," and that the widows almost always emerged from them with a settled conviction of the husband's ongoing existence and well-being.14 If you have felt this kind of warm, peaceful, settled presence, the data is overwhelmingly on the side of receiving it as a comfort.
But not every experience is comforting. A small minority of sensed-presence reports come freighted with fear, with demands, with pressure toward something that does not feel right. The same 1996 study noted that thirty percent of "still attached" bereaved daughters described the bond as intrusive — typically when there was unfinished business with the deceased: a relationship marked by conflict, a death that left things unresolved.15 This kind of experience deserves a different response.
A Note on Discernment. A welcomed sensed presence is consistent with Christian faith. A sensed presence that crosses certain lines is not. Watch for: (1) Fear instead of peace. The fruit of the Spirit is peace; lasting fear is not from God. (2) Demands or commands, especially commands that contradict Scripture or pull you toward unbiblical action. (3) Pressure toward secrecy — the impulse to hide the experience from your pastor or trusted Christian friends. (4) An invitation to seek further contact (mediums, séances, ouija, induced communications). The biblical line is bright: receive what is unsought; do not seek the dead (Deut. 18:10–12). The full discernment framework is in Chapter 25.
So, practically — what do you do? Six brief words of pastoral counsel, addressed directly to the bereaved reader.
Receive it with thanks. If the experience produced peace, gratitude, a sense of being loved — receive it the way you would receive any gentle gift in grief. Say thank you to God. Say it out loud if you want.
Do not try to repeat it. Sensed presences come unsought. They are not a technique. They are not a spiritual practice. The widow who tries to manufacture them is reaching for the wrong thing. Receive what is given. Do not chase what is not.
Do not build doctrine on it. Whatever you experienced, it is not Scripture. It is not a revelation that should change what you believe about Christ, salvation, or the afterlife. Hold it humbly, beneath the Bible. The Bible tells you your loved one in Christ is alive and well; that is the source of your hope. Your experience is, at most, a tender confirmation.
Do not isolate from the church to pursue it. Some bereaved persons, after such an experience, drift away from their church and toward groups, books, or practices that promise more contact. That is dangerous ground. The communion of saints is found in the gathered church, not in the séance room.
Do tell a trusted Christian friend or pastor. Bring the experience into the light. Speak it out loud. Let someone love you while you process it. The shame and silence around these experiences is itself a wound — and the cure is the safe sharing of them in Christian community.
Hold it humbly. Let it be what it is. A moment of grief in which love continues to be felt. A small mercy. A reminder that breath stopping does not stop the love. Walk in peace.
Linda's pastor sat with her for an hour that night. He did not tell her she had received a vision. He did not tell her she had been deceived. He did not tell her she was imagining things. He told her the truth as best he knew it.
"What you felt is one of the most common experiences in grief," he said. "Christians have been having it for two thousand years, even when they have been afraid to admit it. Your mother lived in that house for fifty years. The walls remember her. Your heart remembers her. The Spirit of God who comforted you both in life is comforting you now. And your mother, who is alive with Christ, is part of a great gathered people of God who are praying with us right now. I do not know exactly which of these is what you felt. I suspect more than one is true. But none of them, Linda, is anything to be afraid of."
Linda cried. She thanked him. The next Saturday, she went back to the house. She packed boxes. She said hello to her mother again, out loud, without flinching. And she felt, this time, less startled and more held.
Take these slowly. There are no right answers.
1. Have you ever felt the presence of someone you love who has died? What were you doing? What was the place? What did the experience feel like in your body?
2. What did you do with the experience? Did you tell anyone? If not, why not?
3. Were you taught, growing up, that experiences like this were dangerous, demonic, imaginary, or shameful? Where did that teaching come from?
4. As you read this chapter, did you feel relief, surprise, suspicion, comfort, or something else? What is your honest reaction?
5. If your sensed-presence experience produced peace and love, can you find a way to receive it with thanks today, perhaps with a short prayer?
6. If your sensed-presence experience produced fear or unease, who is a trusted Christian — a pastor, an elder, a mature friend — you could share it with this week?
7. What would it mean, for your grief, to believe that your loved one in Christ is part of "the spirits of the righteous made perfect" — fully alive, fully held, present with the Lord?
Key pastoral observation. Sensed presence is one of the most universal experiences in grief and one of the most underdiscussed in pastoral training. Half of the bereaved people in your church have had one, and most have never told you. Many have been quietly carrying shame about it for years. When you preach or teach openly about it, you give a hidden suffering permission to come into the light.
A second observation: many bereaved persons have already decided, before they ever bring it up, that you will think they are crazy. So they hint. They test the waters. They ask side questions. The pastoral skill is to notice the hint, lean in, and create the space. A simple question opens the door: "Have you had any experiences since [the deceased] died — anything that surprised you?"
What to say. Three sentences a pastor or friend can use, almost verbatim:
(1) "What you experienced is real, and it is normal. Many, many bereaved Christians have something like this happen."
(2) "I don't know exactly what it was — God's Spirit comforting you, your memory of her in the place she shaped, or a tender mercy permitted by the God who is Lord of the living and the dead. It may be more than one of those at once. We do not have to settle it to receive it."
(3) "If it brought peace, receive it with thanks. If it brought fear, let's talk about it together — not in shame, but in the light."
What NOT to say. Three responses that wound the bereaved, however well meant:
(1) "You're imagining it." The bereaved already worry they are imagining it. This dismissal seals their isolation and makes them less likely to bring future experiences to anyone.
(2) "That was demonic." Reflexive demonization of grief experiences is theologically careless and pastorally cruel. The vast majority of sensed presences are not from the enemy, and treating every comforting felt presence as spiritual warfare leaves the bereaved afraid of their own healing.
(3) "You should move on." The instruction to "move on" or "let her go" is not biblical pastoral care. It is a leftover of older grief models that have been dismantled by the research and were never actually grounded in Scripture. Christians do not "let go" of those they love who have gone home; we hold them differently.
Watch-outs. A small number of cases will need more than ordinary care. Watch for: (a) sensed-presence experiences that produce escalating fear, sleeplessness, or a sense of being pursued — possible signs the experience is not from God; refer to the discernment chapter and provide pastoral support. (b) Prolonged preoccupation with seeking presence — daily attempts to reproduce or extend the experience, especially if the bereaved is drifting from the church into groups or practices that promise more contact. This may signal complicated grief (Chapter 31) or a drift toward forbidden seeking. (c) Sensed-presence experiences accompanied by relational unfinished business — when there was conflict or estrangement before the death. These often need slower, deeper care; the issue is rarely the presence and almost always the unfinished work the death interrupted.
Next steps. Most cases need only what you have already given: a safe ear, an honest word, a brief biblical framing. Send the bereaved home with permission to receive what God has given and to bring you anything that troubles them. Pray with them, briefly, before they leave. Most of the time, that is enough.
Dennis Klass, Phyllis Silverman, and Steven Nickman, eds., Continuing Bonds. The watershed academic volume that overturned the older "letting go" model of grief and documented sensed-presence experiences across cultures.
Louis LaGrand, Love Lives On: Learning from the Extraordinary Encounters of the Bereaved. A counselor's accessible survey of bereavement encounters, including sensed presence; readable for general audiences and helpful for normalizing.
George Bonanno, The Other Side of Sadness. A leading grief researcher's account of the resilience and ordinary meaning-making of bereaved persons, including the place of sensed presence in healthy grieving.
J. Steve Miller, Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1. A careful Christian engagement with the wider literature on after-death communications, including extensive treatment of sensed-presence research and its theological implications.
Jerry Sittser, A Grace Disguised. A Christian theologian's memoir of catastrophic loss; the chapter on the ongoing presence of those we have lost is particularly tender.
1 The standard contemporary clinical definition appears in Dennis Klass, Phyllis R. Silverman, and Steven L. Nickman, eds., Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief (Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996), 17–18. The "sense of presence" is distinguished from full apparitional experience by the absence of specific sensory content. ↩
2 Ira O. Glick, Robert S. Weiss, and C. Murray Parkes, The First Year of Bereavement (New York: Wiley, 1974), 146, as discussed in J. Steve Miller, Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1 (Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2023), chap. on after-death communications, under "The Harvard Bereavement Study." ↩
3 Glick, Weiss, and Parkes, The First Year of Bereavement, viii, 154–55, cited and discussed in Miller, Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1, chap. on after-death communications, under "The Harvard Bereavement Study." ↩
4 W. Dewi Rees, "The Hallucinations of Widowhood," British Medical Journal 4 (1971): 37–41. Rees's term "hallucination" is technical and arguably misleading; the experiences are typically not psychotic in character and are not associated with mental illness. ↩
5 Glick, Weiss, and Parkes, The First Year of Bereavement, 147, in Miller, Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1, chap. on after-death communications. The persistence of sensed presence over time, while other grief features fade, is one of the more striking empirical features of the phenomenon. ↩
6 Jenny Streit-Horn, "A Systematic Review of Research on After-Death Communication (ADC)" (PhD diss., University of North Texas, 2011), 17–27, as summarized in J. Steve Miller, Deathbed Experiences Dissertation, chap. 1, "A Survey of After-Death Communication Research." ↩
7 Estimates vary depending on definition and population. The 30–60% range for sensed presence in the first year is consistent across the Harvard study, Rees, and the contributors collected in Klass, Silverman, and Nickman, Continuing Bonds. ↩
8 J. M. Olson et al., as summarized in Streit-Horn, "A Systematic Review of Research on After-Death Communication," and in Miller, Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1, chap. on after-death communications, under "Hesitancy of the Bereaved to Report." ↩
9 Kirsten Tyson-Rawson, "Relationship and Heritage: Manifestations of Ongoing Attachment Following Father Death," in Klass, Silverman, and Nickman, Continuing Bonds, 136. ↩
10 The biblical asymmetry between the prohibition on the living seeking the dead (Deut. 18:10–12; Isa. 8:19) and the openness to God-initiated moments of contact (Matt. 17:1–8; 1 Sam. 28) is treated more fully in chap. 25 below. ↩
11 On the careful exegesis of Hebrews 12:23 as a reference to deceased believers in the conscious intermediate state, see John W. Cooper, Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000), chap. 4, "New Testament Anthropology," sec. on Hebrews 12:23, 113–14. ↩
12 Cooper, Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting, chap. 4, "New Testament Anthropology," 113–14. ↩
13 Tyson-Rawson, "Relationship and Heritage," in Klass, Silverman, and Nickman, Continuing Bonds, 135–36, 143. ↩
14 Roberta Conant, "Memories of the Death and Life of a Spouse: The Role of Images and Sense of Presence in Grief," in Klass, Silverman, and Nickman, Continuing Bonds, 179–88, summarized in Miller, Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1, chap. on after-death communications, under "A Study of Boston Widows." ↩
15 Tyson-Rawson, "Relationship and Heritage," 139. The thirty percent of "still attached" daughters who described the bond as intrusive consistently reported pre-death conflict or estrangement; the experience appears more correlated with relational unfinished business than with the spiritual character of the experience itself. ↩
16 Bill Guggenheim and Judy Guggenheim, Hello From Heaven: A New Field of Research, After-Death Communication, Confirms That Life and Love Are Eternal (New York: Bantam, 1995). The Guggenheims' large case collection contains many sensed-presence reports embedded within fuller after-death communication accounts. ↩
17 Louis E. LaGrand, Love Lives On: Learning from the Extraordinary Encounters of the Bereaved (New York: Berkley Trade, 2006). LaGrand, a counselor and grief educator, offers the most accessible book-length treatment of sensed presence and related bereavement experiences from a non-confessional perspective. ↩
18 All Scripture quotations in this chapter are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. ↩
Conant, Roberta. "Memories of the Death and Life of a Spouse: The Role of Images and Sense of Presence in Grief." In Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief, edited by Dennis Klass, Phyllis R. Silverman, and Steven L. Nickman, 179–96. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996.
Cooper, John W. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.
Glick, Ira O., Robert S. Weiss, and C. Murray Parkes. The First Year of Bereavement. New York: Wiley, 1974.
Guggenheim, Bill, and Judy Guggenheim. Hello From Heaven: A New Field of Research, After-Death Communication, Confirms That Life and Love Are Eternal. New York: Bantam, 1995.
Klass, Dennis, Phyllis R. Silverman, and Steven L. Nickman, eds. Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996.
LaGrand, Louis E. Love Lives On: Learning from the Extraordinary Encounters of the Bereaved. New York: Berkley Trade, 2006.
Miller, J. Steve. Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1: A Groundbreaking, Scientific Apologetic, Evaluating Death-Related Visions, Terminal Lucidity and After Death Communications. Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2023.
Miller, J. Steve. Deathbed Experiences Dissertation. Project file manuscript.
Rees, W. Dewi. "The Hallucinations of Widowhood." British Medical Journal 4 (1971): 37–41.
Streit-Horn, Jenny. "A Systematic Review of Research on After-Death Communication (ADC)." PhD dissertation, University of North Texas, 2011.
Tyson-Rawson, Kirsten. "Relationship and Heritage: Manifestations of Ongoing Attachment Following Father Death." In Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief, edited by Dennis Klass, Phyllis R. Silverman, and Steven L. Nickman, 125–45. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996.