Laura sat across from me at my kitchen table, a mug of tea gone cold between her hands. It was a Tuesday afternoon in late October, and the light through the window behind her made her look older than her forty-six years. Her daughter, Hannah, had been seventeen. Three months earlier, on a two‑lane road outside of town, another driver had crossed the center line. Hannah had been driving home from her summer job at the coffee shop. She had been wearing her seat belt. None of it had mattered.
Laura had not come to me for counseling. She had come, she said, because she needed somebody to sit in the room with her while she spoke her daughter's name out loud. At home, her husband flinched when Hannah was mentioned. At church, people had stopped asking how she was doing — not, she knew, out of unkindness, but because they did not know what to say and were afraid of making her cry. "I am already crying," she told me. "They are not saving me from anything."
She spoke for a while about small things. The way Hannah had always left her shoes in the middle of the hallway, even after a thousand reminders. The way she hummed when she thought no one was listening. The way she had, at fifteen, suddenly begun hugging her mother goodbye every morning, as if somebody had whispered to her that these were going to be precious years. Laura stopped there and pressed a napkin to her eyes.
"I know what people have told me," she said. "They tell me she is in a better place. They tell me God needed another angel. They tell me she is at peace. I hate it. All of it. I do not want her in a better place. I want her here, in my kitchen, being irritating about homework and leaving her shoes where I trip on them." She looked up. "Pastor, do you know what I actually want? I want somebody to tell me she is still her. That she did not just stop being Hannah when the car rolled."
I did not say anything for a long minute. Then I said, "She is still Hannah. She is with Jesus. She is herself. You will see her again."
Laura sat very still. "Do you mean that?"
"Yes," I said. "I mean every word of it."
She put her face in her hands and wept for a long time. I did not interrupt her. When she was able to speak again, she said, "Nobody has told me that. Nobody. For three months, not one person has told me that my daughter is still my daughter."
That is the ache this chapter exists to meet. It is one of the oldest aches in the human race, and it has never gotten easier. If you have buried a child — whether that child was a tiny heartbeat on a grainy ultrasound, a newborn who lived for six hours, a five‑year‑old with pigtails, a teenager like Hannah, or a forty‑year‑old adult you watched grow up — this chapter is for you. You are not alone at this table. Scripture has words for you that you may not have heard. The research has things to say that may surprise you. And the Christian tradition, for all its stumbles, speaks with near unanimity at the point where you most need it: your child is not lost.
Chapter Thesis: There is no grief in this world like the grief of a parent who has buried a child. The Bible never minimizes this sorrow, and neither will I. But Scripture, the broad stream of Christian teaching, and the careful research on dying and near‑death experiences all converge on a single pastoral truth: children who die — from the smallest miscarriage to the grown adult child — are not lost. They are held by the Savior who once took little ones into His arms and said, "Let them come to me." This chapter offers what Scripture warrants for bereaved parents: real, specific, grounded hope — hope that does not erase your sorrow, but sits beside it, and refuses to leave.
Before we go to Scripture, before we go to the research, we need to say something plain. The grief of losing a child is not like other griefs. It is a grief that runs backward through time. The child was supposed to bury the parent, not the other way around. When a parent dies, we lose our past — the arms that held us, the voice that named us. When a child dies, we lose our future — the college graduation, the wedding, the grandchildren, the phone call on Mother's Day forty years from now that will never come. A widow, however broken, at least expected someday to stand beside her husband's grave. No parent expects to stand beside a child's.1
Researchers who study bereavement consistently find that the death of a child produces some of the most severe, prolonged, and complicated grief of any loss category.2 Parents who have lost children carry elevated risks of depression, complicated grief, physical illness, and marital rupture. The research is not softening anything; it is telling the truth. If you are a parent who has lost a child, and you feel that the grief has reached some depth the rest of the world does not go to, you are right. It has.
I say this plainly because the first gift a pastor or a friend can give a bereaved parent is simply to tell the truth about what has happened. You have not lost a pet. You have not lost a phase of life. You have lost a whole human being who came from your own body or your own heart, and whose absence is not an absence of one person but of every version of that person they were ever going to be. The seven‑year‑old you could still see in the teenager's jawline. The twenty‑year‑old who was just coming into view. The thirty‑year‑old you would never meet. All of them, gone at once.
And yet — and this is the whole point of this book — the Christian faith does not leave us at the edge of that crater. It does not ask us to pretend. It does not hand us a pious cliché. It hands us a real Savior who has real words about real children who have really died. Let us go and hear them.
The first place the Bible speaks directly to the bereaved parent is in the grief of King David. His infant son lay dying. For seven days David fasted and wept on the floor of his house, begging God for the child's life. Then the child died. The servants were afraid to tell him, knowing how wildly he had grieved while the baby was still alive. But when David realized the child was gone, he rose from the floor, washed, changed his clothes, went into the house of the Lord and worshiped, and then came home and asked for food.
His servants were bewildered. They asked why he was behaving this way — fasting while the child lived, eating now that the child had died. Here is what David said:
"While the child was still alive, I fasted and wept, for I said, 'Who knows whether the LORD will be gracious to me, that the child may live?' But now he is dead. Why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he will not return to me" (2 Samuel 12:22–23, ESV).
Read those last ten words slowly. I shall go to him, but he will not return to me. David is not saying, as some have suggested, merely that both he and the infant will eventually be dust in the grave. David, like any Israelite father, knew that his own body would one day return to the earth. But the way he speaks here is personal. He expects to go to his son. He expects to find him. He expects to be with him. This is the confident hope of reunion, spoken by a father who had every reason to let grief collapse into despair and who did not.3
Notice also what David does with the grief itself. He had wept and fasted on the floor for seven days while the child fought for life. He did not pretend to be fine. He did not perform stoicism for the sake of his servants. He poured his grief out to God. Then, when the child was gone and no amount of fasting could change what had happened, he got up. He washed. He worshiped. He ate. This is not denial. This is the shape of hopeful grief. David is not pretending he is not devastated. He is acknowledging that his grief has a future, and that future is not an endless corridor of absence. The future includes the son. "I shall go to him." Not eventually. Surely. Certainly. As certain as the next sunrise.
If you are a parent who has lost an infant — whether by miscarriage, stillbirth, sudden infant death, or any other cause — David's words are spoken over your grief, too. He will not return to you. But one day, by the grace of the God who meets us at the edge of every grave, you will go to him. And the meeting will not be a brief introduction. It will be a father finding his son. A mother finding her daughter. Arms that held the baby for seconds on earth will hold the beloved person for eternity.
The single most important passage in the whole Bible for a bereaved parent is not a theological treatise. It is a scene. A group of mothers and fathers, on some ordinary afternoon in Galilee, brought their children to Jesus so that He could touch and bless them. The disciples, thinking themselves helpful, tried to shoo the families away. Jesus was busy. Jesus was important. Jesus had more serious people to talk to.
Mark tells us Jesus was indignant. The Greek word (ēganaktēsen, ἠγανάκτησεν) is strong. He was not mildly annoyed. He was upset. And He rebuked His own disciples in front of the crowd, saying:
"Let the children come to me; do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it" (Mark 10:14–15, ESV).
And then, Mark says, He took them in His arms, laid His hands on them, and blessed them. Do not hurry past that picture. The Lord of glory — the eternal Son through whom all things were made — sat down in the dust of a Galilean road and gathered children into His arms. Not as a photo op. Not as a moral lesson. Because He wanted them there.
If you have ever wondered what Jesus is like with your child right now — whether your child was a tiny embryo whose gender you never knew, or an infant, or a toddler, or a teenager whose soul has just passed from earthly life into His presence — you are wondering about the very Jesus who was angry at His own friends for shooing kids away. He is not a Jesus who puts up with children. He is a Jesus who wants them near Him. "To such belongs the kingdom of God." Not reluctantly. Not barely. It belongs to them.4
The Greek verb for "took in his arms" in Mark 10:16 (enankalizomai, ἐναγκαλίζομαι) is a tender, physical word — to enfold, to embrace. Mark uses it only one other time in his Gospel, in 9:36, where Jesus places a child in the midst of His quarreling disciples and draws the child into His arms as a living parable. In both scenes the same thing is happening: the Lord of glory, the one through whom the universe hangs together, is making physical, specific contact with a named small person. This is not abstract love. This is arms. This is breath on the top of a head. This is the warmth of another body. And if this is what Jesus was like then, this is what Jesus is like now. The welcome your child received on the other side of death was not a colder welcome than the welcome those Galilean children received on that dusty afternoon. It was warmer. More real. More His own.
In Matthew 18, Jesus is teaching about childlikeness and about the seriousness of causing a child to stumble. He says:
"See that you do not despise one of these little ones. For I tell you that in heaven their angels always see the face of my Father who is in heaven" (Matthew 18:10, ESV).
We can argue about the finer points of angelology — whether every child has a particular guardian angel, or whether Jesus is speaking more broadly. We do not have to resolve that debate to hear what He is saying. Children are not beneath heaven's attention. They are not overlooked. They are, in some sense, specifically represented before the Father's face. If heaven pays that kind of attention to a child walking through a Galilean village, heaven has not looked away from the child you have buried.5
Jeremiah gives us the other side of the picture: the sound of a mother's grief. "A voice is heard in Ramah, lamentation and bitter weeping. Rachel is weeping for her children; she refuses to be comforted for her children, because they are no more" (Jeremiah 31:15, ESV). Rachel, the matriarch, is poetically pictured weeping over her descendants carried away into exile. Centuries later, Matthew picks up this exact verse to describe the slaughter of the little boys of Bethlehem by Herod (Matthew 2:18). A whole region drenched in the weeping of mothers.
If the Bible stopped there, we would still know that Scripture takes a mother's grief seriously enough to record it in two testaments and give it a name. But the Bible does not stop there. Two verses later, the Lord speaks over Rachel's weeping:
"Keep your voice from weeping, and your eyes from tears, for there is a reward for your work, declares the LORD, and they shall come back from the land of the enemy. There is hope for your future, declares the LORD" (Jeremiah 31:16–17, ESV).
God does not silence Rachel. He speaks into her weeping. He says: there is hope for your future. He says: they shall come back. For Jeremiah's original readers, this was a promise about exiled Israelites returning from Babylon. But the whole shape of biblical hope reaches beyond Babylon. It reaches to the resurrection. It reaches to the day when every Rachel will hear familiar footsteps on the other side of death's door. "They shall come back." Not to the old life. To the true one.6
For those who have lost a child to miscarriage or stillbirth, Psalm 139 is often the passage that first makes them feel seen. David writes:
"For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb. I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.… My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them" (Psalm 139:13, 15–16, ESV).
Read this verse as a bereaved parent of a miscarried child. Your baby, whom no one else on earth ever met, was seen. Before you knew you were pregnant, God was knitting. Before you had a name picked out, God had a name. Before anyone else could hear the heartbeat, God heard the person.7 Your child was not a medical footnote or a chemical pregnancy. Your child was a known person — knit, woven, numbered, loved. And when the heartbeat stopped, God did not stop knowing. He does not know us only as we are visible to ourselves.
There is a story in 2 Kings of a wealthy Shunammite woman who gave hospitality to the prophet Elisha. Elisha, wishing to bless her, promised that she would have a son — a joy she had long since stopped hoping for. She had the child. He grew. One morning, in the field with his father, he cried out, "My head, my head!" A servant carried him to his mother, and he died on her knees at noon.8
She did not wail. She did not collapse. She laid the boy on Elisha's bed, closed the door, and rode straight to the man of God. When he asked if all was well, she said only, "All is well." Elisha came. He went into the room alone, shut the door, and prayed. The child came back to life.
God did not raise every dead child in ancient Israel. He will not raise every dead child now. The Shunammite story is not a pattern we can demand. But the story does something else: it opens a window onto the Lord's heart. When a mother laid her dead child at the prophet's door, heaven did not turn away. The prophet interceded. God answered. The story tells us, in narrative form, that the Lord is not indifferent to the grief of a mother with a dead son across her lap.
For most of the church's history, pastors and theologians have had to stand beside grieving parents and say something about where their children had gone. The record is uneven. It is worth looking briefly at, because some of what grieving parents have been told — even recently — is not, in fact, what the church has always or even mostly taught.
Augustine of Hippo, in the fifth century, was one of the greatest theologians the church has ever produced. But on the question of unbaptized infants, Augustine cast a long and troubled shadow. Pressed by controversies over original sin, he concluded that infants who died without baptism could not enter heaven.9 He softened this with the notion that their punishment would be "mildest" — but it was punishment nonetheless. This teaching, carried forward through medieval Latin theology, is the deep root from which the later idea of limbus infantium (the limbo of infants) grew.
I say this so you can hear something important: Augustine's view on this point was not a simple reading of Scripture. It was a conclusion drawn from a particular framework of sacramental theology that made baptism the absolute entry point to grace. When the framework is examined biblically, the conclusion does not hold. Scripture nowhere teaches that an infant who dies without baptism is lost. The New Testament is, frankly, almost silent on the question in those terms — and where it does speak to children, it speaks the way Jesus did: "Let them come to me."10
John Calvin, a thousand years after Augustine, offered a much gentler word to Christian parents who had lost children in infancy. He affirmed that God could and did regenerate infants — that the grace of election reached to the womb. Covenant children, Calvin taught, were to be regarded as held by God. Later Reformed writers were sometimes more cautious, sometimes more broad, but the door Augustine had closed tightly was being reopened.11
In 2007, the Vatican's International Theological Commission issued a statement — approved by Pope Benedict XVI — that effectively moved the Catholic Church away from the older idea of a permanent limbo for unbaptized infants. The commission noted that Scripture does not teach such a limbo and concluded that there are serious theological and liturgical grounds for holding out hope for the salvation of infants who die without baptism.12 For grieving Catholic parents, and for the wider Christian family, this was a long overdue pastoral turn.
Among contemporary evangelicals, the convergence is remarkable. Charles Spurgeon, the great nineteenth‑century Baptist preacher, insisted that all infants dying in infancy are taken to be with Christ. R. C. Sproul, John MacArthur, Billy Graham, Albert Mohler, and Ronald Nash — writers from varied branches of the evangelical family — have all, in one form or another, affirmed that children who die before the age of moral accountability are embraced by the grace of God through Jesus Christ.13 This is not fringe sentimentality. It is the mainstream evangelical conviction, grounded in the character of God and the clear trajectory of Scripture.
What the Church Is Saying Now: On the question of the child who dies too young to trust Christ consciously, the evangelical voice today is broadly united: such a child is received by the Savior who said, "Let the little children come to me." This is the historic stream of Christian hope, spoken over every cradle that became a grave.
Why can Christians speak this way about children who die? Four considerations, woven together, give the hope its weight.
First, the character of God Himself. The God revealed in Jesus Christ is not a God looking for technicalities on which to condemn. He is, in the apostle John's plain phrase, love (1 John 4:8). The Father who did not spare His own Son for us (Romans 8:32) is not the kind of Father who consigns infants to ruin on a default setting. He does not desire that any should perish (2 Peter 3:9). His heart, revealed at every page of Scripture, moves toward rescue.
Second, the atonement of Christ. Jesus died for sinners — including those who cannot yet articulate their need. The original‑sin question is real; Scripture does teach that the effects of Adam's fall reach to every child of Adam's race (Romans 5:12–21). But the same passage teaches that the remedy in Christ is even wider. "As by one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous" (Romans 5:19, ESV). If original sin is real, so is original grace. The cross is not a narrower thing than the fall. It is wider.14
Third, the moral logic of accountability. Scripture consistently ties judgment to conscious rejection of known light (John 3:19; Romans 1:19–21; 2:12–15). A child who has not yet reached the capacity to knowingly reject Christ cannot stand under the same condemnation as an adult who has spent a lifetime doing so. This is not the Bible bending to sentiment. It is the Bible's own logic. Jesus Himself implied it when He said of those who had not seen the signs He worked, "If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have been guilty of sin" (John 15:22, ESV). Responsibility is calibrated to what has been given.
Fourth, Jesus' own revealed heart. We do not have to guess what Jesus thinks of children. He told us. He showed us. He sat down with them. He took them on His lap. He was indignant when people tried to keep them away. When He wanted an image for the kingdom, He used a child. This is decisive, pastorally. Whatever theological refinements we may wish to add, we are not permitted to imagine a Jesus who is less welcoming to children than the one in the Gospels. He is more welcoming, not less. He is the same Jesus now as He was on that Galilean road.
There is a reason this matters so much. Many grieving parents have been quietly told, or have absorbed from a thousand sermons, a picture of Jesus that is more like a reluctant judge than a gathering shepherd. They have been taught to imagine Him as requiring a specific set of conditions to be met — a profession, a baptism, a particular wording, a particular stage of cognitive development — before He will claim a child as His own. Scripture does not describe that Jesus. Scripture describes a Jesus who looks for reasons to include, not reasons to exclude. A Jesus who stops a funeral procession at Nain to give a widow back her son (Luke 7:11–17). A Jesus who travels across a sea to heal a father's demon‑tormented child (Mark 9:14–29). A Jesus who takes a Jewish synagogue ruler's dead daughter by the hand and whispers her into life (Mark 5:35–43). When this Jesus meets a child at the gate of eternity, He is not working from a flow chart. He is working from His own nature. His own nature is love.
For these four reasons, the church can stand beside a bereaved parent and say, with real grounding rather than pious wishing: your child is with Jesus. Not because we know a doctrine. Because we know Him.
The specific grief of miscarriage and stillbirth deserves its own careful word. It is, in many churches, the most minimized grief of all. Parents who have lost a baby in the womb are routinely told, in gentle but devastating terms, that their loss does not quite count. "At least it was early." "You can try again." "It wasn't really a baby yet." "God must have known something was wrong." Each of these sentences, however well‑meant, functions to erase the child.
Hear this clearly: miscarriage is the death of a child. Early miscarriage is the death of a child. Stillbirth is the death of a child. You are allowed to grieve. You are allowed to name the baby. You are allowed to mark the day. You are allowed to cry. You are allowed to be angry. You are allowed, for the rest of your life, to count that child in the number of your children. Because God does.15
Psalm 139 has already told us the theological truth. The child you lost was known by God in the womb, named in the heart of the Creator, woven by His fingers. That child is not a theological footnote. That child is a person in the conscious presence of Jesus.
There is one other gift I want to offer here, gently. The research literature on grieving parents — including those who lost babies prenatally — consistently records experiences that parents themselves describe as meaningful encounters: vivid dreams of the child, sensed presences, unaccountable moments of peace, sometimes even specific knowledge parents say they have been given.16 I will not overstate this. Not every parent has such an experience, and absence of one proves nothing. But many parents do, and when they do, they are often afraid to say so, because they fear being told they are crazy. You are not crazy. Such experiences are common, cross‑cultural, and frequently reported by emotionally healthy adults.17 We will return to this territory in Chapter 22, where we take up the research on after‑death communications more carefully.
For now, one image. In the book Heaven Is for Real, a four‑year‑old Colton Burpo told his mother that he had met his sister in heaven — a sister he had never been told about, because she had been lost to miscarriage before he was born. His mother had never discussed the loss with him. He described the girl, told his mother she had no name ("you didn't name her"), and added simply that she was waiting for them.18 I cannot verify every detail of any one account. I can say this: the story does not stand alone. The literature on children's near‑death experiences contains many accounts in which children report meeting relatives they never met and whose existence was unknown to them.19 What any grieving parent may do with the Burpo account is their own business. What I cannot do is pretend it is not there.
Some losses come after you have already met the child. The newborn who lived a few hours. The baby in the NICU you held for six days. The two‑year‑old who died of a sudden fever. The three‑year‑old who choked on something no one saw coming. Sometimes SIDS — sudden infant death syndrome — leaves a parent to wake up into the worst reality they can imagine.
For these parents, the pastoral word is both the same and more particular. The theological ground is the same: your child is with Christ. The particularity is this: you also lost the person you had already begun to know. The weight of her small body on your chest at 2 a.m. The face he made when he tasted his first strawberry. The laugh that made the whole family laugh. Those memories are holy. They are not to be buried with the child. They are part of the child, and the child is still a person, and you will know that person again.
Research on terminal lucidity — moments of unexpected clarity and peace at the edge of death — has been documented even in dying infants and very young children, who have been observed reaching out toward something unseen, smiling at unseen visitors, at times speaking of Jesus or of heaven just before death.20 Dr. Diane Komp, a pediatric oncologist who taught at Yale School of Medicine, recorded repeated accounts of her young cancer patients who spoke with calm certainty of angels, of Jesus, of deceased relatives before they died. She was, by her own account, a self‑described agnostic or atheist when she entered her career. The experiences she witnessed at the bedsides of dying children changed her mind.21 The witnesses that moved her were not theologians. They were children who were not old enough to know what a theological expectation was.
If you have sat beside a dying infant or young child, the kind of small moments that sometimes occur in those hours are not fantasies. A baby who reaches out. A toddler who smiles at something in the corner. A small voice that says "Pretty." These moments may be nothing. They may also be something. Christian pastors have sat with dying children for two thousand years and have known, quietly, that the veil at the end of a small life is sometimes very thin.
When a young child dies — four, six, nine years old — the specific cruelty is that you had just come to know this person. Their preferences. Their favorite shirt. The very specific grief of their absence is the specific shape of them. No general grief fits; only their grief does. The couch is wrong because her body is not on it. The car is wrong because his car seat is still in it.
Here, the gift of memory is both unbearable and precious. Do not let anyone rush you out of it. Do not pack her room up on a schedule someone else thinks is healthy. Do not take down his drawings because a grief book said it was time. Keep what you need. Put away what you need. The only rule is that you go at your own pace, and your pace is slow.
The theological ground, again, is solid. Your child is with Christ. Your child is still himself. Your child is still herself. The particular humor, the particular gentleness, the particular courage — these are not lost. The Bible does not teach that heaven melts a person into a generic light. It teaches that heaven is where we become most ourselves.22 The child you knew is still that child. Only more so.
Laura's grief — the grief in the opening of this chapter — sits here. Teenagers are half‑adult, half‑child. You have watched them begin to emerge. You have seen the kind of grown person they were going to be. When they die, the grief is the grief of the child and the grief of the adult they will never be. Two losses, packed into one.
There is often, at this age, a harder question too. Did she know the Lord? Was his faith real, or was it only the Sunday‑morning version? Most teenagers are in the middle of their own spiritual formation when they die. They have not arrived anywhere. They have started.
Here the doctrine explored in Chapter 13 of this book — the real biblical ground for postmortem opportunity — matters. Scripture does not teach that God's loving pursuit of a soul ends at the moment of physical death. The God who loved your teenager on Monday does not stop loving them at Tuesday's funeral. If your daughter was not in a simple place of settled faith when she died, the Savior who met her is not a cardboard cutout shaped by the limits of her earthly categories. He is the real Jesus, and He is fully capable of meeting a teenager's half‑formed faith with a welcome far larger than the adults around her knew how to give.23
And here the near‑death experience literature, carefully read, has something worth hearing. Young people who have been clinically dead and then resuscitated have, in some cases, reported being met by a figure they identified as Jesus with an almost overwhelming love — a love that was not contingent on their having lived a particularly religious life, a love that was clearly Him, reaching across the gap in ways their earlier experience of Him had only hinted at.24 Some of these young experiencers had been deeply troubled, spiritually uncertain, even self‑destructive. The encounter did not condone their confusions. It also did not condemn their person. It offered them what they had always needed: the living Christ, face to face.
This is not a guarantee about your teenager. I do not hand you certainty where Scripture does not give me certainty to hand. What I do hand you is warranted hope: the Savior who said "let the little children come" is the Savior who met your seventeen‑year‑old on the other side of the crash. He is not the stranger she feared He might be. He is the One she was, perhaps, only beginning to know.
I have sat with parents in their seventies who lost an adult child in their forties or fifties. Their grief was as raw as any young parent's. They had known this person for forty years. They had finished raising him. They had watched him raise his own family. They had expected, in the ordinary course of things, that he would bury them, and here they were, picking out his casket.
The grief of an adult child includes griefs younger parents do not carry in the same way. Unfinished conversations. Old arguments never resolved. The strange inversion of a parent outliving a grown child. Sometimes the complicated grief of having lost the person who was going to help take care of you as you aged.
If your adult child was a believer, you have the full, straight promise of Scripture: he is with Christ. She is present with the Lord (2 Corinthians 5:8). There is no lessening because of the adult category. A believing adult child, absent from the body, is at home with the Lord.
If your adult child's faith was uncertain — or rejected outright — please read Chapter 13 carefully. The Lord who pursues the lost does not stop pursuing at the moment of death. The God who is love does not become someone else once the casket closes. You are allowed to hold hope for your child. That hope is not a cope; it is a theological conviction held by serious Christians across the centuries. It does not eliminate the possibility that a person finally and freely chooses to reject God forever. But it refuses to close the door that God has not closed.25
Some losses come with an additional layer of horror. The drunk driver. The house fire. The homicide. The suicide (which receives its own chapter, Chapter 15). The accident that a parent witnesses, or that a parent finds. Traumatic death lays its own kind of iron on the heart, and the images can haunt a parent's imagination for years.
Two specific pastoral words here. First: you almost certainly will need trauma‑informed professional support alongside your pastor and your church. Grief and trauma are related but not identical, and trauma responds to specific therapies — EMDR, trauma‑focused CBT, prolonged exposure — that your pastor is not trained to deliver. Seek out a trauma‑competent Christian counselor. This is not a failure of faith. This is wisdom.
Second, and pastorally crucial: the trauma of the dying moment does not reach into the intermediate state. What your child suffered in the final seconds of earthly life is not what your child is suffering now. The soul that was in pain on this side of death is not in that pain on the other side. Near‑death experience research consistently notes that those who have clinically died in violent or traumatic circumstances report an almost immediate cessation of pain and terror upon leaving the body.26 This is not folk comfort. It is what the evidence actually shows. Your child's present reality is not the horror of the last moments. Your child's present reality is the peace of Christ.
A Line the Research Draws Carefully: Studies of near‑death experiences, including those triggered by catastrophic injury, consistently describe a release from physical and emotional suffering at the moment of leaving the body, followed by feelings of extraordinary peace. For grieving parents of children who died traumatically, this research is worth knowing. The horror of the last seconds is not the horror of the next ten thousand years.
Some parents lose a child who had a disability — cognitive, physical, or both. The grief is layered. You have grieved all their life for the life your child did not get to live as you had imagined. And now you grieve the child themselves. Some of these parents are also quietly wondering whether the heaven they have been told about will restore their child or erase them. Will my son still be my son, or will he become somebody else?
The answer is not complicated. Your child is still your child. The new creation is not a deletion of who they were; it is the full flourishing of it. Their disability does not define their personhood, and the removal of the disability does not dissolve the person. Everything that was most essentially them — the laugh, the gentleness, the specific presence — remains. The resurrection is the healing of bodies and the preservation of persons. Your child will be your child, entirely, more so than ever, held together in Christ.27
Grieving parents deserve to know that the research on near‑death experiences, deathbed visions, and after‑death communications has something specific to say to them. I will summarize briefly; each of these topics has its own chapter elsewhere in this book.
Children's NDEs. Pediatrician Melvin Morse, working at Seattle Children's Hospital, conducted the first systematic study of children's near‑death experiences. Across more than a hundred young patients, he documented core elements consistent with adult NDEs: out‑of‑body awareness, encounters with light, meetings with Jesus, and — strikingly — encounters with deceased relatives the child had never met or been told about.28 A child who met a relative she had never been shown a photograph of is difficult to explain as wish fulfillment. She was not wishing for a stranger.
Deathbed experiences. Dr. Diane Komp's collected cases at Yale include dying children who reported visions of Jesus, of angels, of deceased family members, and who died calmly, even joyfully, where medical staff had expected terror.29 Dr. Peter Fenwick's and Dr. Christopher Kerr's large studies of dying patients have documented similar patterns across thousands of cases — experiences consistently reported by dying patients (including children) as real, peace‑giving, and meaningful, not as delirium or wishful thinking.30
After‑death communications with deceased children. Parents who have lost children report extraordinarily consistent content in the experiences they describe: a sense that the child is present, a dream of unusual vividness, a voice, sometimes a short message. The content is remarkably stable across thousands of reported cases: "I'm okay." "I love you." "Don't worry." Research on bereaved parents has shown that those who report such experiences, when received warmly by those around them, often experience significantly better long‑term grief outcomes than those whose experiences are dismissed or pathologized.31
None of this research proves the Christian picture of heaven. The research is not doing theology. But the research is strongly consistent with the biblical claim that the soul of a believing child continues in the conscious presence of God, and that the bonds of love between parent and child are not dissolved by bodily death. Grieving Christian parents are not required to weigh every line of research. They are, however, permitted to know that the careful evidence supports rather than contradicts the hope Scripture gives them.
A Note on Discernment: If you are a bereaved parent and you have had an experience of your deceased child — a vivid dream, a sensed presence, a moment that felt real — you are not crazy, and you are not alone. Such experiences are common and are frequently reported by emotionally healthy grieving parents. Receive them gently. Tell a pastor or trusted friend who will not dismiss you. Two simple tests: Does the experience draw you toward the Lord, not away from Him? Does the "message," if any, fit the Christ of the Gospels? If so, you have no reason to fear it. Be cautious, however, of actively seeking such experiences through mediums, séances, or spiritualist practices — Scripture is clear that this is not the way to love (Deuteronomy 18:10–12; Isaiah 8:19). God may come close to you in your grief. You do not need to go looking for your child in dangerous places. We treat this territory more fully in Chapters 22–25.
I want to step out from behind the sub‑headings for a moment. If you are reading this as a bereaved parent, let me say some things to you as simply as I can.
Your child is not lost. That is the first sentence and the most important one. The word lost implies that someone does not know where your child is. God knows. God has her. God holds him. Your child is exactly as known to God tonight as she was the day she was born. You do not know where to address the letter you want to write. God knows the address.
And there is something more here. When well‑meaning friends say "I'm sorry for your loss," they are right to name your grief, but the word loss can become a small lie if you let it. A child is not a set of keys. A child is not a job. A child is a person — and in Christ, a person is not able to be lost. Your child may be out of your sight. Your child is not out of God's. And the distance between you and your child is the only kind of distance the resurrection is designed to close.
Your child is with Christ. Not in some vague cosmic light. Not absorbed into a general energy. With Christ — the same Jesus who walked to Jairus's house, took a little girl by the hand, and said, "Talitha cumi" (Mark 5:41, "Little girl, arise"). That Jesus. Specifically. Your child is with Him.
Your child still loves you. The bonds of love forged in this life are not deleted by death. Scripture's picture of the communion of saints is a picture of persons who love, remember, and in some sense are still aware — the souls under the altar in Revelation 6 were neither impersonal nor unaware. They remembered. They cared. They waited. Your child, held in Christ, has not become less of herself. She has become more so. And the love she had for you is not one of the things death stole. It is one of the things Jesus guarded.32
You will see your child again. I cannot tell you the day. I cannot tell you the hour. I cannot tell you the precise shape of that reunion. I can tell you the promise. "I shall go to him," said a father thousands of years ago, on the floor of a palace, with his face washed and his heart broken. "I shall go to him." You will go to her. Not because the pain was worth it. It was not. But because the God who made her has made her yours, and what He has made yours He is not in the habit of losing.
You do not have to "get over" this. Anyone who has told you to get over the loss of a child does not know what they are asking. You are going to carry this grief for as long as you live. Not as a wound that never heals — grief does transform, slowly, into something a person can live with — but as a love that never switches off. The Christian tradition has a quiet word for this: continuing bonds. The love keeps going. The love keeps knowing them. The love keeps counting them in the family. This is healthy. This is biblical. This is a Christian form of grief that does not close the door Christ has promised to open.33
The time between here and reunion may feel unbearable. I will not tell you it is short. For you, right now, a week is long. I will tell you that it is not more than the Lord who made you can bear with you. You are not walking through this alone. The Lord Jesus, who knew grief, who wept at Lazarus's tomb, who carries us in the arms of His resurrection, is walking with you step by step, even on the nights when you cannot feel Him at all. He is not less present for being invisible. He is more.
And one day — on a morning we cannot quite picture from here — you will round some corner of the new creation, and there will be your child. Still herself. Still her. Still laughing the particular laugh. And when she hears your voice, she will look up, and she will know you, because love does not forget. And the first words you say will probably not be profound. They will probably be her name. And she will come running. And the long, long winter of not seeing her will be over.
That is the hope this chapter has been built to give you. It is not a promise I have invented. It is a promise the God of Scripture has made. "I shall go to him, but he will not return to me." We shall go to them. And the God who made that promise is the God who keeps them.
One last word before we turn to the reflection questions. Some of you, reading this, are not only grieving the death of your child. You are also grieving the version of yourself that died with the child. The mother you had expected to be. The father who was going to coach the team. The grandparent who would have held the next generation. Those losses are real too, and they do not disappear just because the central loss is greater. You are allowed to grieve the future you lost along with the person you lost. And the same Savior who holds your child also holds the parts of you that did not survive this. You will be put back together. Not exactly as you were. Something in you will always be shaped by the loss. But the future version of you — the one standing in the new creation with your child back in your arms — will be a person whose wounds have become, in ways you cannot yet see, part of how you love. Nothing about this loss was wasted. Everything about it will be redeemed.
What was your child's name? Say it out loud. Write it down. The silence around the name is not holiness. The speaking of the name is.
If you could say one thing to your child right now, what would it be? Say it anyway. You may not know exactly how, but Christ is not the kind of Savior who loses messages of love between a parent and a child.
Which of the passages in this chapter most spoke to you? Is there one you would like to spend the next week with — rereading, praying, letting it become part of the air you breathe?
Who in your life is still willing to hear about your child? Who flinches? Is there one safe person to whom you could go and simply say the name, and tell a story?
What have you been told about your child's eternal state that you are not sure is true? What did this chapter either confirm or challenge? What new word of hope, if any, has met you here?
Where is the hardest moment of your week — the school pick‑up line, the family dinner, the Sunday morning pew? What would it look like for Christ to meet you specifically in that moment, not to erase the grief but to sit beside it?
Is there one small thing you could do this week to honor your child's continued place in your family — a candle lit, a photograph placed, a song played, a name spoken at a family meal? What one small act of love would feel true, rather than performed?
Bereaved parents will cross your ministry for the rest of your life. Your first duty is to refuse the flinch. Refuse to look away. Refuse to change the subject. Refuse to let the silence around the child's name continue. Parental grief is the most underserved pastoral category in most churches, because most pastors have never been trained how to meet it and most congregations are afraid to ask. This is the work. Lean in.
Parental grief is lifelong. Do not think in terms of the funeral week, the first month, or the first year. Think in decades. The mother of a teenager who died in 1998 is still the mother of that teenager in 2028. You will still be her pastor. Commit to that long horizon now, or you will quietly disappoint her when she needs you most — which is probably not on the funeral day but on some random Tuesday two years from now when the weight comes back without warning.
Bereaved parents often feel invisible in the church. People stop mentioning the child. People avoid eye contact. People change the subject. This is not malice; it is pastoral illiteracy. Your job, specifically, is to model the alternative. Say the child's name. Say it at graveside and at the one‑year mark and on the birthday and when you run into the parent in the grocery store. "I was thinking about Hannah this week." That is the sentence that will save the parent's heart a little bit every time you say it.
Marriage under parental grief is fragile. Rates of marital distress — and yes, divorce — rise sharply after the loss of a child, partly because spouses grieve differently, partly because each spouse often becomes an unintentional reminder to the other of the shared loss. Do not assume two parents are grieving the same way. Do not assume they are grieving at the same pace. Watch for signs that one or both of them is drifting, and gently suggest couples grief counseling — with a trauma‑informed Christian counselor — long before either of them would think of asking for it.
"Your child is with Jesus." Say it simply. Say it without hedging. If you cannot say it confidently of an adult child whose faith was uncertain, say at minimum: "Jesus loves your son. Jesus met him. I trust that love."
"Your child is still loved. Your child is still known. Your child is still himself." Many parents fear, at some secret level, that their child has been dissolved into a general light. Tell them no.
"You will see him again." Simple. Biblical. Unadorned.
"Tell me about her." Five words. Five of the most healing words in the whole pastoral vocabulary. Use them often. Mean them.
"I am going to be here. Not just this week. Not just this year. For the long haul. Put me on your phone. I will not forget her. I will not forget you."
"At least you have other children." Never. This sentence does invisible damage every time it is spoken. It treats children as interchangeable. They are not. The grief of a lost child is not softened by the presence of living ones. Parents love each child as a specific, irreplaceable person. Honor that.
"God needed another angel." This is theologically false (humans do not become angels) and pastorally damaging (it implies God took the child on purpose for heaven's benefit). Do not say it. Correct it gently when others do.
"Everything happens for a reason." What the bereaved parent hears is, "The reason for my child's death is more important than my child's life." They may nod politely. They will not trust you with anything real afterward.
"Time heals all wounds." Time does not heal this wound. Grace does. Time does something different — it teaches a person to carry what cannot be healed. Say that instead.
"I know exactly how you feel." Unless you have also buried a child at the same age from the same cause under the same circumstances, you do not. Say instead, "I cannot imagine. I am here. I am listening."
"Will you tell me about her? Whatever you want. I have all the time you need."
"What is hardest about today?" — not "How are you?" Specific. Actionable. Real.
"What have people been telling you about your child's eternal state? Has anyone said anything that hurt?"
"Is there someone who has walked with you in this? Who have you been able to cry with?"
"What do you need most right now — presence, silence, a meal, help with paperwork, someone to go with you to the grave?"
Watch for the anniversary. The month of the death, the child's birthday, Christmas, Mother's Day, Father's Day, first day of school, graduation year, wedding‑that‑would‑have‑been — all of these are grief‑activating. Put these dates on your calendar. Text, call, show up.
Watch for the surviving siblings. A child who has lost a brother or sister is a grieving person whose grief is often overshadowed by the parents' grief. Make sure someone in the congregation is specifically paying attention to them.
Watch for complicated grief and trauma. A parent who is still unable to function six, twelve, or eighteen months after a traumatic loss is not weak. They may have a specific condition that responds to specific treatment. Have a referral list ready — Christian counselors trained in complicated grief, in trauma, in parental bereavement — before you need it.
Watch for disenfranchised grief in miscarriage cases. Women (and their partners) who have miscarried often feel they are grieving a loss the church does not acknowledge. Acknowledge it. Consider naming rituals. Consider remembrance services. Consider simply, privately, saying the unnamed child's memorial aloud with them.
Watch for the parent who stops coming to church. Do not assume they are "fine with space." Go see them. Sit on their porch. Bring coffee. Say nothing if that is what they need.
Leave this chapter with the bereaved parent if you think they can absorb it. Offer to read it together.
Connect them, early, to a specific support resource: The Compassionate Friends (for any child loss), MISS Foundation (for perinatal and pediatric loss), GriefShare, or a local Christian grief support group.
Schedule the follow‑up. Do not leave it vague. "I'm going to come back two weeks from Thursday. Is that okay?" Put it on the calendar. Show up.
Remember the one‑year mark. Text, call, or visit specifically on the death anniversary. You are probably the only person outside the immediate family who will, and you will never regret it.
Pray specifically, by name, for the child at the graveside service, at the one‑month mark, at the one‑year mark, and every year thereafter that you are this family's pastor. Say the name. Christ knows the name. Let the parents hear that you know it too.
Nancy Guthrie, Holding On to Hope: A Pathway Through Suffering to the Heart of God — written out of Guthrie's own losses of two infants; indispensable companion for bereaved parents.
Jerry Sittser, A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows Through Loss — written after Sittser lost his wife, mother, and young daughter in a single car crash. Honest about rage; honest about hope.
Ronald Nash, When a Baby Dies: Answers to Comfort Grieving Parents — a careful biblical treatment of the theological basis for infant salvation.
Diane M. Komp, A Window to Heaven: When Children See Life in Death — a pediatric oncologist's account of what she witnessed at the bedsides of her young patients.
Todd, Sonja, and Colton Burpo, Heaven Is for Real — to be read with appropriate care and discernment, but containing an account of a young child's reported experience of a sibling lost to miscarriage that many bereaved parents have found meaningful.
Ann Voskamp, The Broken Way — not solely about child loss, but richly attentive to the grace that meets us in grief.
1 See Jerry Sittser, A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows Through Loss, 20th anniversary ed. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2004), esp. chs. 1–3. Sittser's account of losing his young daughter (along with his wife and mother) in a single collision is widely recognized as one of the most honest pastoral treatments of traumatic parental loss in print. ↩
2 For a summary of the research on parental bereavement, see Margaret Stroebe, Robert O. Hansson, Henk Schut, and Wolfgang Stroebe, eds., Handbook of Bereavement Research and Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2008); see also Katherine Shear et al., "Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11," PLoS Medicine 6, no. 8 (2009): e1000121. Parental bereavement appears consistently among the strongest predictors of prolonged grief disorder. ↩
3 For the exegetical case that David's "I shall go to him" is a personal, post‑mortem hope of reunion rather than merely a reference to both father and son eventually lying in the grave, see John L. Cooper, Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism‑Dualism Debate, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000), 86–89. See also John Burke, Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God's Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2015), ch. 7. ↩
4 See R. T. France, The Gospel of Mark, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002), 397–400, on the force of ēganaktēsen in Mark 10:14; see also D. A. Carson, "Matthew," in The Expositor's Bible Commentary, rev. ed., vol. 9 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010), 464–67, on the parallel in Matthew 19:13–15. ↩
5 For balanced treatments of Matthew 18:10 and its implications for the dignity and care of children in God's sight, see Leon Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992), 462–64; and Craig S. Keener, A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), 450–52. ↩
6 For the connection between Jeremiah 31:15–17 and the larger biblical hope of resurrection, see N. T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003), esp. chs. 3–4. Wright traces how the OT trajectory of exile‑and‑return hope develops, by the first century, into the specific Jewish hope of bodily resurrection — the hope the NT inherits and centers in the risen Christ. ↩
7 For the exegetical and pastoral use of Psalm 139:13–16 in cases of pregnancy loss, see Ronald H. Nash, When a Baby Dies: Answers to Comfort Grieving Parents (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999), 34–40. See also Jack Hayford, I'll Hold You in Heaven, rev. ed. (Ventura, CA: Regal, 2003). ↩
8 For a pastoral reading of 2 Kings 4:8–37, see Peter J. Leithart, 1 & 2 Kings, Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible (Grand Rapids: Brazos, 2006), 192–96. ↩
9 Augustine, Enchiridion, ch. 93; see also his treatises On the Merits and Forgiveness of Sins and De peccatorum meritis et remissione et de baptismo parvulorum. For a careful historical treatment of the development of Augustinian teaching on unbaptized infants, see Gavin Ortlund, Theological Retrieval for Evangelicals (Wheaton: Crossway, 2019), ch. 6; and more broadly Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines, 5th ed. (London: A&C Black, 1977), 354–55. ↩
10 For an evangelical engagement with and qualified critique of Augustine's position on infants dying unbaptized, see Albert Mohler and Daniel L. Akin, "The Salvation of the 'Little Ones': Do Infants Who Die Go to Heaven?" Southern Seminary Magazine (2009); see also John Piper, "What Happens to Infants Who Die?" Desiring God website, January 23, 2006. Both argue that the evangelical biblical case for the salvation of infants dying in infancy is strong and does not require the Augustinian framework. ↩
11 John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, trans. Ford Lewis Battles, ed. John T. McNeill (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1960), IV.16.17–20; see also B. B. Warfield, "The Development of the Doctrine of Infant Salvation," in The Works of Benjamin B. Warfield, vol. 9 (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1981), 411–444. Warfield documents the broadening of Reformed teaching toward a confident hope in the salvation of all infants dying in infancy. ↩
12 International Theological Commission, The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptised (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2007), §§2, 102–103. The document represents a significant pastoral development within Roman Catholic teaching. ↩
13 See Charles Haddon Spurgeon, "Infant Salvation," sermon no. 411 (September 29, 1861), Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, vol. 7; R. C. Sproul, Now, That's a Good Question! (Wheaton: Tyndale, 1996), 294–95; John MacArthur, Safe in the Arms of God: Truth from Heaven About the Death of a Child (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2003); Albert Mohler and Daniel L. Akin, "The Salvation of the 'Little Ones'"; Nash, When a Baby Dies, chs. 2–4; and Billy Graham, Facing Death and the Life After (Waco: Word, 1987), 148–49. ↩
14 For a helpful treatment of Romans 5:12–21 in relation to the question of infant salvation, see Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans, 2nd ed., Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2018), 272–301. ↩
15 For a pastoral treatment of miscarriage and stillbirth, see Hayford, I'll Hold You in Heaven; and Nancy Guthrie, ed., O Love That Will Not Let Me Go: Facing Death with Courageous Confidence in God (Wheaton: Crossway, 2011). On the research side see M. C. Malm, H. Lindgren, and R. M. Radestad, "Losing Contact with One's Unborn Baby: Mothers' Experiences Prior to Receiving News That Their Baby Has Died in Utero," Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 63, no. 4 (2011): 357–362. ↩
16 See Julia Streit‑Horn, "A Systematic Review of Research on After‑Death Communication (ADC)" (PhD diss., University of North Texas, 2011), 56–75, for a careful review of the research literature. Streit‑Horn documents the prevalence, content, and psychological effects of ADCs across numerous studies. See also Bill Guggenheim and Judy Guggenheim, Hello from Heaven! A New Field of Research — After‑Death Communication — Confirms That Life and Love Are Eternal (New York: Bantam, 1996). ↩
17 Michael Barbato, Cathy Blunden, Kerry Reid, et al., "Parapsychological Phenomena near the Time of Death," Journal of Palliative Care 15, no. 2 (Summer 1999): 30–37. The authors note that the DSM‑IV recognized seeing deceased loved ones during bereavement as a normal (non‑pathological) experience. ↩
18 Todd Burpo, with Lynn Vincent, Heaven Is for Real: A Little Boy's Astounding Story of His Trip to Heaven and Back (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2010), ch. 17. The account is retold and analyzed at length in Burke, Imagine Heaven, ch. 7. ↩
19 See Melvin Morse and Paul Perry, Closer to the Light: Learning from the Near‑Death Experiences of Children (New York: Villard, 1990); and Morse, "Near‑Death Experiences and Death‑Related Visions in Children: Implications for the Clinician," Current Problems in Pediatrics 24, no. 2 (1994): 55–83. Pim van Lommel in Consciousness Beyond Life (New York: HarperOne, 2010), ch. 3, documents additional cases, including one in which a dying child met a sibling whose existence had been deliberately hidden from her by her parents. ↩
20 See Michael Nahm et al., "Terminal Lucidity: A Review and a Case Collection," Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 55, no. 1 (2012): 138–42; and Christopher Kerr and Carine Mardorossian, Death Is But a Dream: Finding Hope and Meaning at Life's End (New York: Avery, 2020), chs. 5–6. ↩
21 Diane M. Komp, A Window to Heaven: When Children See Life in Death (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1992), esp. chs. 2–4. Dr. Komp was Professor of Pediatrics at Yale School of Medicine and treated children with cancer throughout her career. ↩
22 For a substantial biblical‑theological treatment of personal continuity across death and resurrection, see Anthony Hoekema, The Bible and the Future (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979), 92–108; and C. S. Lewis, The Great Divorce (New York: HarperOne, 2001 [1946]), esp. the preface. Lewis argues forcefully that the new creation is the intensification, not the erasure, of the self. ↩
23 For a scholarly evangelical treatment of postmortem opportunity, see James Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity: A Biblical and Theological Assessment of the Possibility of Salvation After Death (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2021). See also Jerry L. Walls, Heaven, Hell, and Purgatory: Rethinking the Things That Matter Most (Grand Rapids: Brazos, 2015); Gabriel Fackre, "Divine Perseverance," in What About Those Who Have Never Heard? Three Views on the Destiny of the Unevangelized, ed. John Sanders (Downers Grove: IVP, 1995), 71–95. ↩
24 See Jeffrey Long with Paul Perry, God and the Afterlife: The Groundbreaking New Evidence for God and Near‑Death Experience (New York: HarperOne, 2016), chs. 1–4; and Burke, Imagine Heaven, chs. 10–12. Encounters with a figure experiencers identify as Jesus are among the most consistently reported features of NDEs. ↩
25 Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, chs. 1–3; Stephen Jonathan, Grace Beyond the Grave (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014); Howard Storm, My Descent into Death: A Second Chance at Life (New York: Doubleday, 2005). Storm's account — of a non‑Christian man whose NDE included an encounter with the living Christ — is among the most widely discussed in the literature. ↩
26 See Kenneth Ring, Lessons from the Light: What We Can Learn from the Near‑Death Experience (Needham, MA: Moment Point, 2006), chs. 1–3; Bruce Greyson, After: A Doctor Explores What Near‑Death Experiences Reveal About Life and Beyond (New York: St. Martin's Essentials, 2021), chs. 3–5; and Long, God and the Afterlife, ch. 2. The cessation of pain upon separation from the body is one of the most consistently reported features of NDEs, including those triggered by catastrophic trauma. ↩
27 For a rich theological treatment of disability and the new creation, see Amos Yong, The Bible, Disability, and the Church: A New Vision of the People of God (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011); and John Swinton, Becoming Friends of Time: Disability, Timefullness, and Gentle Discipleship (Waco: Baylor University Press, 2016). ↩
28 Morse and Perry, Closer to the Light, chs. 2–3; see also Cherie Sutherland, Children of the Light: The Near‑Death Experiences of Children (London: Souvenir, 1995); and P. M. H. Atwater, The New Children and Near‑Death Experiences (Rochester, VT: Bear & Company, 2003), engaging critically where Atwater's interpretive framework departs from Christian orthodoxy. ↩
29 Komp, A Window to Heaven, chs. 2–5; see also J. Steve Miller, Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife: A Groundbreaking, Scientific Apologetic, vol. 1 (Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek, 2021), chs. 4–6, which gathers extensive case material including children's deathbed visions. ↩
30 Peter Fenwick and Elizabeth Fenwick, The Art of Dying: A Journey to Elsewhere (London: Continuum, 2008); Christopher Kerr, Death Is But a Dream; and Peter Fenwick and Sue Brayne, "End of Life Experiences: Reaching Out for Compassion, Communication, and Connection," American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 28, no. 1 (2011): 7–15. Kerr's prospective study of more than 1,400 hospice patients found end‑of‑life experiences to be highly prevalent and experienced by dying patients as real, distinct from hallucinations, and profoundly meaningful. ↩
31 Dennis Klass, Phyllis R. Silverman, and Steven L. Nickman, eds., Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief (Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996), chs. 12–13, which treat bereaved parents specifically; see also Streit‑Horn, "Systematic Review of Research on After‑Death Communication," 62–75. Bereaved parents who perceive ongoing connection to their deceased children consistently report better long‑term adjustment than those whose experiences are dismissed. ↩
32 For a careful exegesis of Revelation 6:9–11 and the continued personal agency of those in the intermediate state, see G. K. Beale, The Book of Revelation, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), 389–95; and Richard Bauckham, The Theology of the Book of Revelation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 51–55. ↩
33 On the concept of "continuing bonds" as a healthy, researched pattern of grief, see Klass, Silverman, and Nickman, Continuing Bonds, esp. the introduction and chs. 1–2. For a Christian theological framework for continuing bonds, see Nancy Guthrie, Holding On to Hope: A Pathway Through Suffering to the Heart of God (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2002), esp. the closing chapters. A fuller treatment of continuing bonds from a Christian perspective appears in Chapter 24 of this volume. ↩