Margaret woke at 3:14 a.m. She knew the time without looking, because the clock on her husband Tom's old nightstand had glowed that same green in the dark for thirty-eight years. It still glowed now. Tom had been dead for seven weeks.
She lay there on her back, the way she always lay when she could not sleep, and listened to the house. The furnace clicked on and off. A car passed on the street. Somewhere a dog barked once and went quiet. The ordinary sounds of a world that had not stopped for her grief.
Then she said it out loud, into the dark.
"Are you okay?"
She was not sure whom she was asking. Not sure if she was asking God, or Tom, or herself. The words just came out, the way they had come out a hundred times since the funeral. In the car. At the sink. Standing at the mailbox at dusk. At the kitchen table over a bowl of soup she did not want.
"Are you okay?"
The silence in the bedroom was almost physical. It pressed down on her chest. She thought of Tom's last week, how he had held her hand and told her not to be afraid, how the hospice nurse had said he went gently in the early morning, while Margaret was asleep in the recliner beside him. She had not been awake for the actual moment. That was one of the many things she now carried.
The pastor had said good words at the funeral. Margaret remembered some of them. She remembered the verse about being absent from the body and present with the Lord. She remembered the choir singing "It Is Well." She remembered how many people came, how many kind notes she had received, how the casseroles had piled up on the counter and then slowly stopped coming.
But the words of the funeral were one kind of knowing, and 3 a.m. was another kind of knowing, and the 3 a.m. kind had gotten harder, not easier, as the weeks went on. In the daytime, Margaret could hold the hope. At 3 a.m., she could only hold the silence.
"Are you okay, Tom?"
She whispered it this time. She felt a little foolish. She knew he could not hear her, not in any way that answered back. Or could he? She did not know what she believed about that. She was a churchgoing woman. She believed in heaven. But what heaven was like — what Tom was doing right now, this minute, at 3:14 in the morning while she lay here unable to sleep — she had no picture for it. She had only the silence of the bedroom and the green glow of the clock and the unbearable, unanswerable question.
Is he okay?
Is he safe? Is he at peace? Is anyone taking care of him? Did he know how much I loved him? Does he know I am still here, still loving him, still asking?
Margaret is real. I have changed her name and some details, but I have sat with Margaret many times, in many living rooms, after many funerals. She is every widow I have ever visited in the long quiet months after the service. She is every mother of a grown child taken too soon. She is every son whose father died without the chance to say what needed saying. She is every believer who trusts the Bible and still cannot sleep.
This chapter is for Margaret. And it is for you, if you are Margaret too.1
Chapter Thesis: The question that haunts every grieving person — "Are they okay?" — deserves a real answer. Scripture gives us the core answer: those who died in Christ are with Christ. The careful research on near-death experiences and deathbed visions, received with biblical discernment, does not replace Scripture but adds specific, converging evidence that deepens and warrants the hope Scripture teaches. You are allowed to sleep tonight.
Every grieving person asks it. Even when they do not say it out loud. Even when they do not know they are asking it.
"Are they okay?"
Not "where are they?" That question comes later, and it comes with a map of sorts — in heaven, with Jesus, at rest. Not "will I see them again?" That question comes later too, usually after the shock wears off and the long ache sets in. The first question, the underneath question, the 3 a.m. question, is simpler and much harder.
Are they okay?
Are they safe? Are they in pain? Is anyone with them? Are they cold? Are they frightened? Do they know where they are? Do they know that we loved them? Are they being cared for?
It is the question a mother asks about a grown child who has moved across the country for the first time. It is the question a wife asks about a husband who has left for a two-week trip. It is the question we never really stop asking about the people we love. When they are away from us, any kind of away, we ask it. And now our loved one is more away than they have ever been, in a place we cannot see and cannot phone and cannot picture clearly, and the question rises up from somewhere very deep and will not be quieted.
I have come to believe that this question — "Are they okay?" — is the most important pastoral question a grieving Christian ever asks. Not because the answer is in doubt for believers. (It is not.) But because the question reveals what grief actually is. Grief is not just sadness that someone is gone. Grief is the love that remains between us and the one we lost, now with nowhere familiar to go. That love keeps reaching for them. That love keeps wanting to make sure they are okay. That is what love does.
The grief researchers call this "continuing bonds" — the ongoing love-relationship with the dead, not as denial of the loss, but as evidence of the love.2 We will come back to this in Chapter 24. But for now, I want you to hear something: the question is not a sign that your faith is weak. The question is a sign that your love is real.
The question deserves a real answer.
And here is what I want to do in this chapter. I want to give you two answers, gently, side by side, and then let you hold them together. The first answer is what Scripture tells us. The second answer is what the careful research on near-death experiences and deathbed visions adds to what Scripture tells us — not replacing it, not correcting it, but adding texture, specifics, and the kind of convergence that lets a grieving person exhale.
I want you to be able to lie back down at 3:14 a.m. and sleep.
If you have read Chapters 2 and 3 of this book, you already have most of what I am about to say. I am going to summarize briefly and not re-argue the whole case. This chapter is meant to stand on its own, so I will give you enough to hold. But if you want the full exegetical treatment, it is back there waiting for you.
Here is the short version. Scripture does not leave us guessing about where Christians are after death. It tells us. Not in a detailed travel brochure — we will get to that in a minute — but in clear, plain, repeated language. Let me give you the three anchor passages.
Philippians 1:21–23 (ESV). "For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain. If I am to live in the flesh, that means fruitful labor for me. Yet which I shall choose I cannot tell. I am hard pressed between the two. My desire is to depart and be with Christ, for that is far better."
Paul is writing from a prison cell. He is weighing whether he hopes to live or die. And he says something breathtaking: dying would mean going to be with Christ, and that would be far better. Not "a little better." Not "about the same." Far better. Whatever Paul thought waited for him on the other side of death, he thought it was so much better than earthly life that he had to stop and remind himself he had work to do here first.3
Paul could not have written that sentence if he thought the dead were unconscious. A Paul asleep in the grave is not "with Christ," and certainly not "far better" than a Paul actively serving Jesus on earth. The comparison only makes sense if, the moment Paul dies, Paul is consciously present with Jesus. That is what he believed. That is what he taught. That is the Christian hope.4
2 Corinthians 5:6–8 (ESV). "So we are always of good courage. We know that while we are at home in the body we are away from the Lord, for we walk by faith, not by sight. Yes, we are of good courage, and we would rather be away from the body and at home with the Lord."
Paul again. Same message, different wording. To be out of the body is to be at home with the Lord. Think about the word home. A home is not a waiting room. A home is where you are known, where you are received, where you belong. Paul is saying: the moment my body dies, my conscious self is at home with Jesus. The word in Greek is endēmēsai — to be present as a resident, to dwell with.5 Not a visitor. Not a houseguest. A resident.
Tom is at home with the Lord.
Luke 23:42–43 (ESV). "And he said, 'Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.' And he said to him, 'Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.'"
The thief on the cross. One of the last conversations Jesus has before He dies. The man asks to be remembered in some distant future kingdom. Jesus corrects him gently and massively. Today. Not at the resurrection. Not at the final judgment. Today you will be with me in paradise.6
There have been attempts to re-punctuate the sentence — "Truly I say to you today, you will be with me in paradise" (as if today refers to when Jesus is speaking, not to when the man will arrive). Those attempts do not work grammatically and they do not work in context.7 Jesus is answering a question about timing. He is telling a dying man, "Before the sun goes down, you and I will be together in paradise."
Paradise. Same word Paul uses in 2 Corinthians 12 for the third heaven. Same word the Septuagint uses for the garden of Eden. A real place. A place where Jesus is.
Put these three passages side by side and the picture is simple. When a believer dies:
They go to be with Christ (Philippians 1:23). They are at home with the Lord (2 Corinthians 5:8). They are in paradise (Luke 23:43). They are conscious. They are aware. They are present with Jesus. They are not suffering. They are not waiting in silent unconsciousness for the resurrection. They are awake, safe, loved, at home.
They are not lost to us, either. The word lost is a word for something that has gone out of knowing, like a set of keys that might be anywhere. Your loved one is not lost. Your loved one is there. In a specific place. With a specific Person. Held by the specific hands that were nailed to a specific cross.8
This is the core Christian answer to the 3 a.m. question. And if you have been grieving a believer, I want you to hear me say it plainly, the way your pastor would say it if he were sitting on the couch with you right now:
Your husband is with Jesus. He is conscious. He is loved. He is at peace. He is more at home than he has ever been.
The Bible says so. This is not guessing. This is not wishful thinking. This is what the apostles taught, what the creeds confess, and what the Church has believed for two thousand years.9
Now let me be honest with you about something. I have to be, because the trust you are giving me as you read this deserves honesty.
Scripture does not give us a detailed travelogue of the intermediate state.
We are told with Christ. We are told at home with the Lord. We are told far better. We are told paradise. These are enormous, weight-bearing words, but they are not itineraries. Scripture does not tell us whether your husband is right now watching the sunrise with Jesus or sitting at a table with his mother or waiting in some quiet place for you to arrive. It does not give us a clock, a map, or a photograph.10
I mention this because sometimes well-meaning Christians overclaim. They talk as if Scripture laid out the intermediate state in full color. It did not. When someone tells you that your mother is watching over you from heaven, or that your child is a guardian angel, or that your grandfather has been given a specific job in the afterlife, they are going past what Scripture says. They may be well-meaning. But they are not quoting the Bible. And when they are wrong, the comfort they offered turns brittle in the cold hours of grief.
The Christian hope is not "we know everything." The Christian hope is "we know enough." And what we know is enough. Your loved one is with Christ. Your loved one is at home. Your loved one is at peace. That is enough to sleep on. You do not need the travel brochure.
But — and here is where this chapter turns — there is more to say.
There is not new doctrine to add. Scripture is the final authority. But over the last several decades, something remarkable has been happening in hospitals and hospices all over the world. People are dying — clinically, medically, documented — and then coming back. Others are dying and describing what they see before they go. And what they are describing is showing up again and again, across cultures, across religions, across income levels, across every other variable you can name. It is showing up in medical journals and university research programs and books written by cardiologists and hospice physicians who started out skeptical. And what these people report is not a contradiction of what Scripture teaches about the intermediate state. It is a quiet, astonishing confirmation.
For the grieving, this is important. Let me show you why.
I want to be careful here before I go any further. So let me say plainly what I am claiming and what I am not claiming.
I am not claiming that near-death experiences (NDEs) and deathbed visions (DBVs) are new revelation. They are not. The Bible is the final word on what happens after death.
I am not claiming that every NDE or DBV is pure and undistorted. Some experiences contain elements that conflict with Scripture, and we must handle those with discernment. Chapter 25 will walk you through this carefully.
I am not claiming that the research proves Christianity. The research does not prove any religion. The research documents what people consistently report at the edge of death.
What I am claiming is this: when you put the biblical teaching on one side of the scale, and the careful medical research on what people describe when they almost die on the other side of the scale, the two scales balance in a way that should take your breath away. The things Scripture tells us about the intermediate state — conscious, aware, at peace, loved, with Christ, far better — are exactly the things that researchers keep documenting, by the thousands, from people who by every medical standard should have had no experience at all.11
Let me walk you through the six things the research adds to what Scripture already teaches — not as new doctrine, but as texture, specifics, and convergence.
When people have NDEs, they are aware. They are not asleep. They are not in a fog. They are more aware than usual.
In Jeffrey Long's survey of over a thousand near-death experiencers, roughly three-quarters reported that during the NDE their consciousness was more alert and clear than in normal everyday life.12 Not less. Not a dreamy, fading awareness. Sharper. More present. They think more clearly than they ever have. They perceive more than they ever have. Time feels different — sometimes stretched, sometimes compressed — but their sense of being themselves is more acute than it has ever been in their embodied life.13
Now pause with me on that. Scripture teaches that Paul hoped to be consciously with Christ after death (Philippians 1:23). The research shows that thousands of people who have almost died report exactly the kind of heightened consciousness Scripture implies.
Your loved one is aware. That is the first thing. Whatever else is happening to them right now, they are not asleep in a silent void. They are present. They are themselves. They are more themselves than they have ever been.
The second thing NDErs and DBV experiencers describe is peace. And when they describe it, they have a hard time finding strong enough words.
In Long's database, roughly eighty percent of NDErs report a peace so profound that they struggle to describe it — a peace unlike anything they had ever experienced in earthly life.14 Pim van Lommel, the Dutch cardiologist whose prospective study was published in The Lancet, found similar results in his Dutch cohort.15 Bruce Greyson, the University of Virginia psychiatrist who developed the standard NDE Scale, has documented the same pattern over four decades of research.16
Deathbed researchers describe the same thing from the other side — not from people who went to the edge and returned, but from people who were observed by family and caregivers as they died. Christopher Kerr, the hospice physician in Buffalo, New York, has documented this carefully in his studies of hospice patients. Patients who were frightened or agitated often became settled, peaceful, even joyful as death approached — especially if they had experienced a vision of a deceased loved one or a spiritual presence.17 Maggie Callanan and Patricia Kelley, hospice nurses who documented thousands of deathbed experiences, describe the same pattern in Final Gifts.18
Paul called it "the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding" (Philippians 4:7). He did not make up the phrase. He lived inside it. And the people who come back from the edge of death use almost that phrase, again and again, to describe what they experienced.
The consistency of this finding is striking for pastoral purposes. It is not that one or two eloquent patients describe peace in lyrical terms. It is that ordinary people — truck drivers and nurses and retired teachers, churchgoing and unchurched, educated and not — reach for the same vocabulary again and again: peace they had never felt before, peace they cannot describe, peace they wanted to stay in. You do not get that kind of uniform testimony from random brain activity. You get it when a large number of human beings have touched something real.
And the peace is not only in the encounter itself. It lingers. NDErs routinely describe their fear of death as simply gone after the experience. Not reduced. Gone. They know what waits, and they are not afraid anymore. Ask them about dying and they will tell you, often with a small smile: "Why would I be afraid? I've already been there."
Your loved one is at peace. Not sedated peace. Not exhausted peace. The kind of peace the apostle Paul could only describe by saying no human mind could grasp it.
The third recurring feature — and I think the most important one — is love. Overwhelming, unconditional, drenching love.
In Jeffrey Long's God and the Afterlife study — which focused specifically on NDEs in which the experiencer encountered God or a divine being — one of the most consistent findings was this: experiencers describe the love they felt as the most powerful experience of their lives, often by orders of magnitude.19 Not "sort of loving." Not "like a hug from a grandparent." Love so total, so unconditional, so enveloping that afterward, for the rest of their lives, earthly love feels dimmer by comparison.
One woman Long quotes said the love she felt was like the first time she saw her baby, or the first time she fell in love, multiplied by ten thousand.20 Another said it was a clean, pure love with no strings attached, healing the deepest part of her.21 John Burke, in Imagine Heaven, walks through case after case and concludes that the love reported in these encounters is the single most consistent theme across the entire research literature — more consistent than tunnels, more consistent than light, more consistent than any single feature anyone associates with NDEs.22
Now hear what Scripture has been telling us all along. "God is love" (1 John 4:8). "Nothing will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord" (Romans 8:39). "Having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end" (John 13:1). The Bible never says your loved one goes to a neutral place. The Bible says your loved one goes to love — to the Person who is love, into an ocean of love so vast it took Paul's metaphors and broke them.
Your loved one is being loved right now. Not remembered. Not mentioned. Loved. Personally. Specifically. By name.
The fourth feature is the light. And behind or inside the light, a Person.
About two-thirds of NDErs in Long's database describe seeing a light — not a painful light, though it is often described as brighter than the sun; a light they can look at without discomfort, a light that seems to have presence and personality.23 Many experiencers describe the light as alive, as conscious, as loving them. About half describe the encounter as being with a definite being of "mystical or otherworldly origin."24
For Christians, the experience is almost always identified as Jesus. Many NDErs who encountered Him report recognizing Him immediately, by the wounds in His hands, by the robe, by the indescribable sense that this is the One they have always known. J. Steve Miller, in his careful study of NDE accounts involving Jesus, notes that these encounters typically produce awe, conversion, and the kind of lasting transformation you would expect if a real person had met with a real person.25
Scripture says, "God is light, and in him is no darkness at all" (1 John 1:5). Scripture says, "I am the light of the world" (John 8:12). Scripture says of the resurrected Christ, "His face was like the sun shining in full strength" (Revelation 1:16).
Your loved one is in the light. The light of Christ. Not metaphorically. Really. We will look at this in much more detail in Chapter 9.
The fifth feature is welcome. NDErs and dying patients frequently report being met, greeted, received by someone.
Sometimes the one doing the welcoming is Christ Himself. Sometimes it is a deceased relative. Sometimes both. In deathbed-vision studies going back to William Barrett's 1926 Death-Bed Visions and Karlis Osis and Erlendur Haraldsson's cross-cultural study At the Hour of Death, the most common content of a dying person's vision is a deceased loved one who has come to welcome them.26 Kerr's hospice research documents the same pattern in modern palliative care: the dying frequently report visits from a parent, spouse, sibling, or close friend who has gone ahead.27
We will look at this in detail in Chapters 7 and 8. For now, hear only the headline: your loved one was almost certainly not alone at the moment of transition. Almost certainly someone was waiting. Almost certainly the Someone we call Savior was there Himself. And almost certainly, if others who had gone ahead were part of God's welcoming committee, they were there too.
Scripture calls Jacob's death being "gathered to his people" (Genesis 49:33). The Hebrew idiom is older than Greek philosophy. It assumes that the dead go to be with the dead who went before. Research a hundred years old and research published last year both document exactly this kind of welcome.
Your loved one was welcomed. Your loved one is not alone.
The sixth feature is the one that may surprise you most. NDErs, with stunning consistency, do not want to return.
I have read hundreds of NDE accounts, and I cannot think of more than a handful in which the experiencer said they were eager to come back to their earthly body. The far more common pattern is resistance. Pleading. Argument. "No, I am not going back." "Please let me stay." "I was home, and then they sent me back."28
Van Lommel tells the story of his first cardiac patient who was successfully resuscitated — and was disappointed. Everyone in the room was celebrating. The patient was grieving. He had just experienced something the medical team could not see and did not understand, and being pulled back into his body was, for him, a loss.29 NDErs routinely describe their earthly body as heavy, clumsy, diminished compared to what they were on the other side.
This matters pastorally. Paul said being with Christ was far better (Philippians 1:23). He said we groan in this earthly tent, longing to be clothed with what comes next (2 Corinthians 5:2). He was not being poetic. He was describing a real perception that people who have touched the edge of death consistently report. Wherever Tom is, it is better. Better than his best day here. Better than the wedding day Margaret remembers, the birth of their daughter, the morning walks they took in retirement. Better.
Your loved one is not homesick for earth.
The research in one sentence: Across thousands of documented cases — in medical journals, in peer-reviewed studies, in the careful work of Long, Greyson, van Lommel, Parnia, Sabom, Kerr, Osis and Haraldsson, Burke, Miller, and many more — the people who have touched the edge of death consistently describe six things: heightened awareness, profound peace, overwhelming love, encounter with a light or presence, welcome by someone (often a deceased loved one or a being identified as Jesus), and a strong reluctance to return. None of this is new doctrine. All of it converges with what Scripture has always taught.
I want to stop here and say something about the shape of this argument, because it matters.
I am not saying that NDEs prove the Christian faith. They do not. I am not saying that the Bible needed the research to be believable. It did not. I am not saying that your hope depends on medical studies.
What I am saying is this: the thing Scripture has been telling us for two thousand years is independently corroborated by a large, cross-cultural, medically documented body of human testimony that did not come from Scripture and did not set out to support Scripture. Most of the researchers are not evangelical Christians. Many are not Christians of any kind. Many are atheists, agnostics, or curious physicians who began this work assuming they would disprove anything supernatural. And still the same themes emerge, again and again, from the hospital beds of California and the hospice rooms of India and the cardiac wards of the Netherlands.30
This is what philosophers call convergence. Independent lines of evidence, from different origins, using different methods, arriving at the same destination. Convergence does not give certainty. But it warrants confidence.
And pastorally, that warrant matters. It is one thing to be told, "The Bible says your mother is with the Lord." That is true, and for many grieving people, it is enough. But for many other grieving people — especially those reading at 3 a.m., when the voice of faith is thin and the voice of grief is loud — it helps to know more. It helps to know that thousands of people who have clinically died, in hospitals all over the world, have come back describing the very things Scripture has been saying. It helps to know that hospice nurses and cardiologists and academic researchers have documented what the Church has been teaching. It helps to know that you are not alone in hoping for what the Bible says is true.31
That is the gift of the research to the grieving. Not a new revelation. Not a second Bible. A quiet, cumulative confirmation that you can trust what the Bible has already told you.
Let me now do what a good pastor would do at this point. Let me answer the 3 a.m. question directly.
If your loved one died in clear faith in Jesus Christ — if they had trusted Him, followed Him as they were able, belonged to His people — then I am going to tell you something, and I want you to read it slowly.
They are not just okay.
They are better than okay. They are better than they have been at any moment of their earthly life. They are with Jesus. They are at home with the Lord. They are in paradise. They are aware. They are loved. They are at peace. They are, in a way none of us has yet experienced, finally and fully themselves.
The person you miss is not reduced or diminished. The person you miss is expanded, healed, held. The parts of them that were broken here are being mended. The parts of them that loved you here are loving you still, more fully, more freely, with all the distortion of sin and weakness and tiredness and fear stripped away.
They are waiting for you. Not impatiently. Time works differently there (which I cannot explain and will not try to). But they are not forgotten, not missing, not lost to the God who made them. And in the long arc of God's story, they are still alongside you in the communion of saints, still part of the family of faith, still bound to you in Christ by a bond that death did not break and cannot break.
When you go to the kitchen tomorrow morning and pour your coffee, they are okay.
When you sit at the table where you used to sit with them, they are okay.
When you go to bed tomorrow night and turn off the light, they are okay.
They are more than okay. They are home.
Now I have to speak to another kind of reader. Not Margaret, whose Tom was a believer. Someone else.
Maybe you are reading this and the words of comfort I just wrote make you cry, not because they comfort you, but because you do not know if they apply to your loved one. Your father walked out of church when you were young. Your son was angry at God the last time you spoke with him. Your sister said, the week before she died, that she did not believe any of it. You do not know. And the not-knowing is its own grief, underneath the grief of losing them.
I am going to be honest with you, and I am going to be gentle with you, because I have sat across from many readers like you, and I know the weight you are carrying.
The short version: I cannot give you the certainty you want, because Scripture does not give any of us that certainty about any particular person. No pastor can tell you the eternal state of a specific person. Not me. Not your minister. Not a saint. Only God knows the heart.
But here is what I can tell you, and what Scripture does give us: the God who loved your loved one in this life did not stop loving them at the moment of death. The God who sent His Son to seek and save the lost did not become less loving when the heart stopped. The God who took on flesh and died on a cross for sinners did not suddenly become less willing to save them because their blood pressure reached zero.
There is a serious, biblically defensible hope — held by significant Church Fathers and by careful contemporary evangelical scholars — that God's opportunity to encounter the unsaved does not end at the moment of physical death. That every human being who has ever lived will, at some point in or beyond the dying process, have a genuine personal encounter with Christ, in which the real Jesus (not the cartoon Jesus of a distorted childhood memory, not the stereotype Jesus of a bad church experience) confronts them in love. That the one who kept loving your father in this life is still loving him now. That your son's anger at God may have been undone by a God he finally saw face to face. That your sister's disbelief may have dissolved when she saw who was waiting.32
This is not universalism. Some finally and irrevocably reject Christ. Scripture is clear about that. But it is not the case — not biblically — that the only chance a person ever has is the specific theological formula pronounced before the final breath. God is larger than that. God's love is larger than that.
I cannot tell you that your father is with Christ. I cannot tell you that he is not. What I can tell you is that the same God of love who pursued him all his life has not stopped pursuing him. And at some point in the sequence of dying and judgment — perhaps before, perhaps in the intermediate state, perhaps at the final accounting — he has received or will receive a real, personal, knowing encounter with the one who died for him. Whether he accepts or rejects, God will have loved him until the last possible moment. That love is not fiction. It is not wishful thinking. It is the character of the God Scripture reveals.
Chapter 13 develops this hope carefully, with the biblical texts and the scholarly voices. For now, please hear this: the question "Are they okay?" for the loved one whose faith was unclear is not a question that ends in darkness. It is a question that ends in "I don't know for certain, and I can hope, and I can trust the God who is love to have done right by them." That is not nothing. That is everything.
I want to say something about certainty, because we pastors fail grieving people at exactly this point more often than anywhere else.
When a grieving widow says, "Is he with the Lord?" and we say, "Of course he is, I know he is" — even though we cannot, in any ultimate sense, know the state of a specific person's soul — we are overreaching. We mean well. We want to comfort. But we are promising what we cannot technically deliver, and that creates a fragile kind of comfort that shatters the first time grief comes back around.
On the other hand, when a grieving widow asks, "Is he with the Lord?" and we say, "We just can't know, can we?" — we have abandoned her in the very moment she needed us to carry something with her.
There is a better answer, and it is the answer I hope this chapter gives you.
We cannot rule on the eternal state of a specific person. God alone judges. But we can confidently say:
The conscious person your loved one was has not ceased to exist. The soul that loved you in this life is a soul, and that soul survives bodily death. The God who loved your loved one has not stopped loving them. Whatever is happening to them now, they are in the hands of the God who is love — who desires all to come to the knowledge of the truth (1 Timothy 2:4), who does not want any to perish (2 Peter 3:9), who chose before the foundation of the world to redeem us in Christ (Ephesians 1:4).
That is a real answer. It is not a "we just can't know." It is not an overpromise. It is Scripture, spoken tenderly, with appropriate reverence for what only God can finally judge. And for most grieving Christians, that answer — combined with the pattern of a life lived in faith, whatever its weaknesses — is more than enough to rest in.
Let me add one more thing on this, because grieving Christians often circle it. Sometimes we worry that a particular sin, a particular season of wandering, or a particular failure has somehow disqualified our loved one. A father who fell away from church for a decade. A sister who struggled with addiction until her final week. A son who never quite worked out what he believed but said, one night years ago, that he wanted to follow Jesus.
I want to be careful not to make promises that are not mine to make. But I do want to say this: the Bible is extraordinarily generous about how salvation works. The thief on the cross had moments to live, no opportunity for baptism, no church membership, no body of evidence except his dying words. And Jesus said, Today you will be with me in paradise (Luke 23:43). The Bible does not teach that salvation is a reward for a well-kept record. It teaches that salvation is a gift received by faith — sometimes faith barely articulated, sometimes faith under the rubble of a broken life, sometimes faith only God can see.
If your loved one ever trusted Christ — however falteringly, however long ago, however hidden under the weariness of later years — Scripture gives you real grounds for hope. The one who began a good work in them is the one who carries it to completion (Philippians 1:6). The hands that hold them are not careless.
Christian hope, at its best, has a particular texture. It is not fantasy. It does not pretend to know what it does not know. It does not invent comforts to paper over pain. It does not promise what Scripture does not promise.
But it also does not cower. It does not stop at "we cannot know." It does not shrink from the weight of the 3 a.m. question. It carries what Scripture teaches with confidence, weighs what the evidence shows with honesty, and offers both to the grieving as a hand to hold.
Nancy Guthrie, who buried two children in infancy and has spent decades walking with grieving parents, describes Christian hope as something honest enough to look grief in the eye and substantial enough to carry a human being through the night.33 Jerry Sittser, who in one accident lost his mother, his wife, and one of his children, has written that the grieving person does not need hope that feels good in the moment. The grieving person needs hope that is true — because only hope that is true will hold up when grief comes back, as it will.34
That is what this chapter is trying to give you. Not a positive feeling. Not a nice thought. Hope you can lean your weight on. Hope that will not buckle at 3 a.m. Hope grounded in Scripture, corroborated by a century of research, held by every generation of the Christian Church since the apostles stood looking up at an empty sky after the ascension.
Your loved one is okay. Better than okay. Safe. Loved. Aware. Home.
You are allowed to believe that tonight.
Let me close the main section with something slower and gentler than all the argument and evidence.
Margaret asked, "Are you okay?"
The Christian answer, in the end, is not quite "yes." The Christian answer is bigger.
If someone you love is with Jesus right now — if they are conscious and aware and present with the Lord — if they are loved by a love that does not run out and never did — if they are in the light of a Being who created every light they ever saw in earthly life — if deceased family members and old friends of Jesus have welcomed them home — if they are finally free of the things that burdened them on this side, the sicknesses and sadnesses and failures and regrets — if they are awaiting the resurrection, the reunion, the re-creation of all things, and if they are awaiting all of it with joy — then they are not just okay.
They are more okay than they have ever been.
They are more themselves than they have ever been. The parts of them that you loved most, the patience and the humor and the gentleness, whatever they were — those are there, cleaner now, free of the dust earthly life leaves on everything. If you loved your grandmother's laugh, that laugh is not gone. If you loved your husband's quiet strength, that strength is not gone. Whatever was them is still them, and it is being refined into its true form.
Your separation is real. I will not take that from you. You cannot call them. You cannot sit at the table with them. You cannot feel the weight of their hand in yours at 3 a.m. when you cannot sleep. The pain of their absence is a true pain, and nothing in this chapter erases it. Scripture does not ask you to pretend grief away. Jesus Himself wept at the grave of a friend He was about to raise (John 11:35).
But your separation is not forever. It is lasting for a while. It is not the final word. The final word is reunion — in the resurrection, in the new creation, in the world where every tear will be wiped away (Revelation 21:4).
Until then, your loved one is okay. More than okay. Home.
Go back to sleep.
A Note on Discernment. This chapter has drawn warrant from the NDE and DBV research literature to strengthen hope that is already grounded in Scripture. It has not claimed that every account in that literature is reliable, uniform, or theologically pure. Some experiences contain elements that contradict Scripture — unorthodox teachings, pressure toward occult practices, content that produces fear rather than peace, or interpretations by the experiencer that go beyond what they actually encountered. The pattern in the research is what supports biblical hope; individual accounts must still be weighed. Chapters 20, 25, and 26 walk through this discernment process carefully. When you come across an NDE book or story that unsettles you, remember: your hope rests on Scripture first, confirmed by the broad pattern of evidence, not on any single story.
These questions are not test questions. They are invitations. Sit with the one or two that press on you. Let the others wait for another day.
1. When you lie awake at night, what is the question you keep asking about your loved one? Try to put it into a single sentence.
2. What would it mean for you, in your grief this week, if you could truly believe that your loved one is not only all right, but flourishing — more alive than they ever were on earth?
3. Is there something about your loved one's faith, their last days, or the way they died that makes you afraid to hope? What is it?
4. Have you been promising yourself a "we cannot know" version of comfort, because it felt safer than full-hearted hope? What would it cost you to believe more?
5. Which of the six patterns from the research — awareness, peace, love, light and presence, welcome, or reluctance to return — speaks most clearly to you, and why?
6. If you could speak one sentence to your loved one right now, and be assured they heard you, what would you say?
7. What is one thing you will do, in the next week, to rest a little more deeply in the hope that they are okay?
I said at the start of this chapter that "Are they okay?" is the most important pastoral question a grieving Christian ever asks. I want to sharpen that claim now, because how you answer it determines much of the comfort your people carry for the rest of their grief.
Grieving people rarely ask the big question directly. They ask it sideways. "Do you think she suffered at the end?" "Was he alone when he died?" "What do you think heaven is like?" "Is my mom in a better place?" These are all the same question. The honest pastor trains herself to hear it underneath every bereavement conversation, not just the theological ones.
The question is specific. The grieving person is not asking about heaven in the abstract. They are asking about this person — the husband with the crooked smile, the mother with the soft hands, the son with the quick laugh. Generic answers ("he's in a better place") feel like a deflection because they do not engage the specific person the bereaved is grieving. Train yourself to answer specifically.
Many pastors under-deliver on hope. We are trained in seminary to avoid overclaiming, which is good. But in bereavement ministry we often swing too far the other way, hedging and qualifying until the grieving person feels we have said nothing at all. There is a better place to stand: confident in what Scripture teaches, honest about what it does not, and willing to say the hopeful thing with warmth and weight.
Here are five specific sentences you can use at the bedside, at the graveside, and in the living rooms afterward. Try them. Adapt them. Put them in your own voice.
"Your husband is with Jesus. He is conscious. He is loved. He is at peace. The Bible teaches this, and every line of human testimony we have about the edge of death confirms it."
"The Bible says he went to be with Christ, which is far better. Not equal to this life. Not a shadow of it. Far better. I want you to hear that word tonight when you lie down."
"I cannot tell you the details. Scripture doesn't give us a travel brochure. But I can tell you the central thing, and it's enough: your mother is at home with the Lord. Not alone. Not afraid. Not forgotten. Home."
"I know you've asked me whether she's okay. Let me give you the honest pastoral answer. She is more than okay. Whatever she was worried about in those last weeks, she isn't worried about it now. Whatever she suffered here, she isn't suffering now. Whatever she was unsure about, she is not unsure now."
"The research on near-death experiences actually backs up what the Bible has been saying. People who have clinically died consistently describe peace, love, and a sense of being met. I don't build my hope on that research — I build it on Scripture — but the research helps warrant the hope. You're not being naïve to believe what the Bible teaches. You're being faithful."
"He's in a better place." This is not wrong; it is just empty. It has been said so often, by so many, about so many different deaths, that it has lost any specific content. Bereaved people hear it as a door closing. Replace it with a specific, biblical, warm sentence.
"He's watching over you from heaven." This is folk belief, not Scripture. The dead in Christ are with Christ; Scripture does not teach that they are functioning as personal guardians over living family members. Worse, it can produce unhealthy spiritualism ("I can feel my dad watching me") that drifts toward practices Scripture forbids. If the bereaved says something like this, you can respond warmly ("There is something to the idea of the cloud of witnesses in Hebrews 12 — you are not disconnected from him"), but steer gently toward what Scripture actually teaches.
"We just can't know." Almost never true. We can know that a believer who died in faith is with Christ. We can know that God's character is love. We can know that no power can separate us from that love. What we cannot know is the specific eternal state of a specific person in ambiguous cases — and even there, we can speak of biblical hope.
"Don't worry about her; she's fine now." Told to a mother grieving her adult daughter, this is dismissive. It minimizes the loss while trying to comfort. The loss is not minor. The comfort should be: she is fine, and you are permitted to grieve anyway.
"Time heals all wounds." Bonanno's grief research has shown us that grief does not follow a standard healing arc, and for many bereaved people this phrase lands like a rebuke for still being sad.35 Avoid it. Grief is not a wound to be healed but a love to be integrated.
"When do you find yourself asking about him?" (This opens the door to 3 a.m. and the car drive and the empty kitchen.)
"What picture do you have in your mind of where she is right now?" (This tells you what imagery they are carrying, and what imagery may need gentle adjustment.)
"Is there something you've been afraid to believe?" (Ask this only after trust is established. It opens the permission door.)
"What do you wish your friends or family would ask you about him?" (Bereaved people often feel nobody wants to talk about the deceased. This question tells them you do.)
"If you could be certain of one thing about where she is, what would you want to be certain of?" (This surfaces their deepest ache and lets you speak directly to it.)
Do not use NDE material as your lead. Lead with Scripture. The research is a secondary warrant, not the foundation of the hope. Bereaved people who have been through bad experiences with NDE-heavy Christian culture (Heaven Is for Real debates, the Alex Malarkey retraction, etc.) will shut down if you walk in quoting Imagine Heaven. Quote Scripture first. Speak of Jesus. If the research comes up, let it be second.
Do not overclaim for unclear cases. When the bereaved is unsure about the deceased's faith, resist the temptation to say, "I'm sure he's with the Lord" if you are not, in fact, sure. Instead, preach the larger hope: God's love pursuing the loved one to the last possible moment, the real encounter with Christ, the trustworthy God whose judgment is right. Chapter 13 gives you the vocabulary for this.
Do not stop at the funeral. The hardest pastoral work in bereavement ministry is the long tail — weeks 4 through 52, when everyone else has moved on and the bereaved is alone with the question. Set a reminder. Go back. Ask again. Bring the hope back around, quietly, for at least a year.
Watch for anniversary waves. The question "Are they okay?" returns in force on birthdays, wedding anniversaries, death anniversaries, holidays. This is normal, not a sign of failed faith. Sit with it. Return to the hope.
Recommend this chapter (or a shorter pastoral handout drawn from it) to bereaved church members between weeks two and six after a death. Earlier than that, they are in shock and cannot hold doctrinal material well. Later than that is still useful but often means they have been sitting with the 3 a.m. question alone for too long.
Pair it with a concrete resource: Nancy Guthrie's Holding On to Hope for the newly bereaved, John Burke's Imagine Heaven for those ready to engage the research, Randy Alcorn's Heaven for those asking bigger imaginative questions, Jerry Sittser's A Grace Disguised for those in the middle of the long dark arc.
Identify one lay person in your congregation — ideally someone who has walked through serious grief and come out the other side with faith intact — who can be a partner in bereavement ministry. The formula of "pastor plus bereaved saint" is almost always stronger than pastor alone, especially for the long tail.
Finally: pray for the bereaved person specifically by name, daily, for the first year. Not in general. By name. For Margaret. For Margaret's peace at 3 a.m. For Margaret's trust that Tom is home. It is amazing what this does, both for the bereaved (who often sense it) and for the pastor (who is shaped by it).
Nancy Guthrie, Holding On to Hope: A Pathway Through Suffering to the Heart of God (Tyndale, 2002). The book to put in the hands of a newly bereaved believer. Guthrie writes from the soil of her own loss, not from theory.
John Burke, Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God's Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You (Baker, 2015). The most accessible Christian treatment of the NDE research in print, pastoral in tone and careful in method.
Randy Alcorn, Heaven (Tyndale, 2004). The reference work for grieving Christians who want the biblical picture of heaven, the intermediate state, and the new creation in one place.
Jerry Sittser, A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows Through Loss, rev. ed. (Zondervan, 2004). Not an NDE book; a grief book. Essential for the bereaved in the long middle months.
Bruce Greyson, After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond (St. Martin's, 2021). For those who want a four-decade researcher's honest, non-evangelical summary of what the NDE research actually shows.
Tim Keller, Walking with God Through Pain and Suffering (Dutton, 2013). For the theological frame around grief: why suffering is not the final word and how the Christian story holds up under loss.
1 The names and many details in opening vignettes throughout this book are composites drawn from pastoral ministry. Identifying features have been changed. The emotional truth is drawn from real conversations with real bereaved Christians over many years. ↩
2 On continuing bonds as a normative feature of healthy grief rather than a sign of pathology, see Dennis Klass, Phyllis R. Silverman, and Steven L. Nickman, eds., Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief (Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996). The continuing bonds framework has supplanted older "detachment" models of grief in mainstream bereavement research. Theological treatment appears in Chapter 24 of the present volume. ↩
3 For full exegesis of Philippians 1:21–23, see Chapter 2 of the present volume. Paul's comparison of three states — living in the flesh, dying to be with Christ, remaining for ministry — becomes incoherent on any reading that denies conscious presence with Christ between death and resurrection. See John W. Cooper, Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000), 151–54. ↩
4 Cooper, Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting, 152. Cooper notes that Paul's contrast in Philippians 1 is between embodiment and disembodiment, with no hint of an extinction-re-creation model. ↩
5 On endēmēsai (ἐνδημῆσαι) as denoting settled residence rather than visitation, see standard lexical treatments; for discussion in context, see Cooper, Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting, 144–49. Full exegetical treatment of 2 Corinthians 5:1–10 appears in Chapter 2 of the present volume. ↩
6 See Chapter 2 of the present volume for the full exegesis of Luke 23:42–43, including the Greek word sēmeron (σήμερον, "today"), paradeisos (παράδεισος, "paradise"), and the unsuccessful repunctuation attempts of some Seventh-day Adventist and Jehovah's Witness commentators. ↩
7 The repunctuation argument — placing the comma after sēmeron rather than before it — is not supported by the Greek text, by early manuscript tradition, or by the narrative logic of Luke 23, in which the dying thief is asking a question about timing. ↩
8 The specificity of Christian hope — the real hands, the real cross, the real paradise — distinguishes biblical teaching from generic afterlife speculation. On the importance of specificity in bereavement care, see Nancy Guthrie, The One Year Book of Hope (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2005), throughout. ↩
9 The conscious intermediate state has been the majority view of the Christian Church across East and West from the patristic period through the Reformation and into most Protestant traditions. See Cooper, Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting, chaps. 5–7, for historical documentation. ↩
10 The restraint of Scripture on the details of the intermediate state is itself theologically instructive. On not overclaiming beyond what Scripture affirms, see D. A. Carson, How Long, O Lord? Reflections on Suffering and Evil, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006), 249–56. ↩
11 The argument here is not that NDE research establishes Christian doctrine, but that the pattern of findings across thousands of cases converges with — rather than contradicts — the biblical picture of the conscious intermediate state. For full methodological treatment, see Chapter 4 of the present volume. ↩
12 Jeffrey Long and Paul Perry, Evidence of the Afterlife: The Science of Near-Death Experiences (New York: HarperOne, 2010), 49–52. Long reports that 74.4% of NDErs in the NDERF database describe their level of consciousness and alertness during the NDE as greater than during normal everyday life. ↩
13 On heightened sensory and cognitive function during NDEs, see Jeffrey Long and Paul Perry, God and the Afterlife: The Groundbreaking New Evidence for God and Near-Death Experience (New York: HarperOne, 2016), chap. 1, "Near-Death Experience Elements," under the heading "Heightened Senses." ↩
14 Long and Perry, God and the Afterlife, chap. 1, "Near-Death Experience Elements," under "Intense and Generally Positive Emotions or Feelings." Long reports that 77.7% of NDErs in the NDERF database describe the experience as involving "incredible peace or pleasantness." ↩
15 Pim van Lommel, Consciousness Beyond Life: The Science of the Near-Death Experience (New York: HarperOne, 2010), passim. Van Lommel's prospective Dutch study, published in The Lancet in 2001, documented similar high rates of peace among NDErs in a rigorous clinical setting. ↩
16 Bruce Greyson, After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond (New York: St. Martin's Essentials, 2021), 84–101. The Greyson NDE Scale, developed in 1983, explicitly includes items on peace and feelings of cosmic unity. ↩
17 Christopher Kerr with Carine Mardorossian, Death Is But a Dream: Finding Hope and Meaning at Life's End (New York: Avery, 2020), chap. 3, "Loved Ones." Kerr documents the peace-bringing function of end-of-life dreams and visions in hospice patients. ↩
18 Maggie Callanan and Patricia Kelley, Final Gifts: Understanding the Special Awareness, Needs, and Communications of the Dying (New York: Bantam, 1997), chaps. 5–7. ↩
19 Long and Perry, God and the Afterlife, chap. 3, "What God Looks Like." Long's God Study focused specifically on NDEs in which experiencers encountered God or a divine being and found overwhelming love to be the single most consistent feature across accounts. ↩
20 Long and Perry, God and the Afterlife, chap. 1, under "Intense and Generally Positive Emotions or Feelings." Quoted account from an NDEr who experienced two cardiac arrests. ↩
21 John Burke, Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God's Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2015), chap. 10, "A Love You'll Never Want to Leave." ↩
22 Burke, Imagine Heaven, chap. 10, "A Love You'll Never Want to Leave," and chap. 13, "The Highlight of Heaven." Burke synthesizes findings across dozens of sources to argue that the experience of overwhelming love is the single most cross-culturally consistent feature of the NDE literature. ↩
23 Long and Perry, God and the Afterlife, chap. 1, under "Encountering a Mystical or Brilliant Light." Long reports that 64.8% of NDErs in the NDERF database report encountering a light. ↩
24 Long and Perry, Evidence of the Afterlife, chap. 3. Long reports that 49.9% of NDErs encountered what they described as a definite being or voice of mystical or otherworldly origin. ↩
25 J. Steve Miller, Is Christianity Compatible with Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? The Surprising Presence of Jesus, Scarcity of Anti-Christian Elements, and Compatibility with Historic Christian Teachings (Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2022), chap. 6, "The Surprising Presence of Jesus." Full treatment of Jesus encounters in NDEs and DBVs appears in Chapter 9 of the present volume. ↩
26 William Barrett, Death-Bed Visions (London: Methuen, 1926); Karlis Osis and Erlendur Haraldsson, At the Hour of Death: A New Look at Evidence for Life after Death (New York: Hastings House, 1997). Osis and Haraldsson's cross-cultural comparison of American and Indian deathbed visions found that the single most common content type in both cultures was the appearance of deceased loved ones who had come to welcome the dying. ↩
27 Kerr, Death Is But a Dream, chap. 3, "Loved Ones." ↩
28 Burke, Imagine Heaven, chap. 10, "A Love You'll Never Want to Leave." See also Long and Perry, God and the Afterlife, chap. 4, "Exchanges with God," under "The Return," which documents the strong resistance to returning reported by most experiencers. ↩
29 Van Lommel, Consciousness Beyond Life, introduction. Van Lommel recounts the case of his first successfully resuscitated cardiac patient, who was disappointed to return to earthly life after his experience. See discussion in Miller, Is Christianity Compatible?, chap. 4, under "Heaven is a place you want to go." ↩
30 The cross-cultural consistency of core NDE features — while acknowledging culturally inflected interpretive content — is one of the most robust findings in the research literature. See Osis and Haraldsson, At the Hour of Death, on the U.S.-India comparison; and Allan Kellehear, Experiences near Death: Beyond Medicine and Religion (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), on the broader cross-cultural picture. ↩
31 On the pastoral function of convergent evidence in strengthening biblically grounded hope, see J. Steve Miller, Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1: A Groundbreaking, Scientific Apologetic, Evaluating Death-Related Visions, Terminal Lucidity and After Death Communications (Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2023), introduction. ↩
32 Full treatment of postmortem opportunity appears in Chapter 13 of the present volume. For foundational scholarly treatment, see James Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity: A Biblical and Theological Assessment of Salvation after Death (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2021); Stephen H. Jonathan, Grace Beyond the Grave: Is Salvation Possible in the Afterlife? A Biblical and Theological Assessment (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014); Jerry L. Walls, Does God Love Everyone? The Heart of What's Wrong with Calvinism (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2016). ↩
33 Nancy Guthrie, Holding On to Hope: A Pathway Through Suffering to the Heart of God (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2002). Guthrie lost her daughter Hope at six months and her son Gabriel at six months, from the same rare metabolic disorder. ↩
34 Jerry Sittser, A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows Through Loss, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2004). Sittser lost his mother, his wife, and his four-year-old daughter in a single automobile accident. ↩
35 George A. Bonanno, The Other Side of Sadness: What the New Science of Bereavement Tells Us about Life after Loss (New York: Basic Books, 2009). Bonanno's research challenges the assumption that grief follows predictable stages or a standard healing timeline. ↩
Barrett, William. Death-Bed Visions. London: Methuen, 1926.
Beilby, James. Postmortem Opportunity: A Biblical and Theological Assessment of Salvation after Death. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2021.
Bonanno, George A. The Other Side of Sadness: What the New Science of Bereavement Tells Us about Life after Loss. New York: Basic Books, 2009.
Burke, John. Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God's Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2015.
Callanan, Maggie, and Patricia Kelley. Final Gifts: Understanding the Special Awareness, Needs, and Communications of the Dying. New York: Bantam, 1997.
Carson, D. A. How Long, O Lord? Reflections on Suffering and Evil. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.
Cooper, John W. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000.
Greyson, Bruce. After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond. New York: St. Martin's Essentials, 2021.
Guthrie, Nancy. Holding On to Hope: A Pathway Through Suffering to the Heart of God. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2002.
———. The One Year Book of Hope. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2005.
Jonathan, Stephen H. Grace Beyond the Grave: Is Salvation Possible in the Afterlife? A Biblical and Theological Assessment. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014.
Kellehear, Allan. Experiences near Death: Beyond Medicine and Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Keller, Timothy. Walking with God Through Pain and Suffering. New York: Dutton, 2013.
Kerr, Christopher, with Carine Mardorossian. Death Is But a Dream: Finding Hope and Meaning at Life's End. New York: Avery, 2020.
Klass, Dennis, Phyllis R. Silverman, and Steven L. Nickman, eds. Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996.
Long, Jeffrey, and Paul Perry. Evidence of the Afterlife: The Science of Near-Death Experiences. New York: HarperOne, 2010.
———. God and the Afterlife: The Groundbreaking New Evidence for God and Near-Death Experience. New York: HarperOne, 2016.
Miller, J. Steve. Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1: A Groundbreaking, Scientific Apologetic, Evaluating Death-Related Visions, Terminal Lucidity and After Death Communications. Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2023.
———. Is Christianity Compatible with Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? The Surprising Presence of Jesus, Scarcity of Anti-Christian Elements, and Compatibility with Historic Christian Teachings. Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2022.
Osis, Karlis, and Erlendur Haraldsson. At the Hour of Death: A New Look at Evidence for Life after Death. New York: Hastings House, 1997.
Sittser, Jerry. A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows Through Loss. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2004.
van Lommel, Pim. Consciousness Beyond Life: The Science of the Near-Death Experience. New York: HarperOne, 2010.
Walls, Jerry L. Does God Love Everyone? The Heart of What's Wrong with Calvinism. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2016.