Building a Trustworthy Library of Near-Death Testimony
A friend recently told me a story that captures why this chapter matters. She had been reading about near-death experiences for about a year. Her sister had just lost her husband, and the grief was crushing. My friend wanted to send her sister a book — something gentle, honest, Christ-centered, something that might give her a small window of hope that her husband was alive with Jesus and that she would see him again. So she walked into a large Christian bookstore, went to the shelf where the NDE books were kept, and just stood there. Alexander. Burpo. Moody. Piper. Neal. Alexander again, with a different cover. A book she had never heard of by someone she had never heard of. A glossy title with a smiling face. Another one with a glowing tunnel. She picked up three and read the back covers. She put them back. She picked up three more. She felt, she told me later, completely paralyzed. "Which ones can I trust? Which ones will help my sister? Which ones will make it worse?"
That paralysis is exactly what the last twenty-eight chapters of this book can accidentally produce if we are not careful. We have spent a lot of pages learning how NDEs can go wrong. We have looked at hybrid experiences, distressing experiences, universalist conclusions, reincarnation claims, soul-contract language, psychic aftereffects, and alien encounters. If you have read the book straight through, you may now feel that every NDE book on the shelf is a potential trap, every NDEr a potential teacher of error, every testimony a potential lie. That is not the posture this book wants to leave you in.
Because it is simply not true.
A substantial body of NDE testimony is trustworthy. Some of it is extraordinary. Some of it has brought thousands of people to Christ. Some of it has deepened the faith of pastors and professors and ordinary believers in ways that Scripture alone — somehow, mysteriously — had not yet done for them. The God who gave us the written Word has also, it seems, been willing to touch real people at the edge of death in ways that confirm rather than contradict that Word. And those people have written books. And those books can be handed to a grieving sister with real confidence.
This chapter is a reader's guide to those books.
My goal in these pages is simple. I want to give you a working list of NDE authors whose testimonies and scholarship you can read with confidence — not uncritically, not without your Bible open, but without the constant anxiety that you are being sold counterfeit goods. I want to explain what makes an author trustworthy so that you can make that judgment yourself when a new name appears in the next decade. And I want to send you out of this chapter able to walk into a bookstore, or a library, or an online reading list, and pick up three titles without feeling paralyzed.
Let us begin by stating the principle that organizes everything that follows.
The author of the most important recent book on NDE discernment, Shaun Tabatt, points out in The NDE Conspiracy that Christians tend to fall off one of two sides of a narrow road. Some dismiss every NDE as either a brain event, a fabrication, or a demonic deception. Others accept every NDE book on the shelf, repeat every testimony without evaluation, and treat NDErs as modern prophets. Both postures fail the biblical command to test the spirits.1 The faithful road is narrow. Walk it carefully, and you will find that most NDEs and DBEs are genuine, that a meaningful minority are not, and that many authors fall somewhere in the middle where careful reading is required.
J. Steve Miller's research is the clearest statement of this balance in the current literature. Miller, who has spent years analyzing the large corpus of NDE accounts at the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation (NDERF), argues that the overall fit between the core content of NDEs and the core content of biblical Christianity is much better than the skeptical view admits.2 The dying meet a bright presence of overwhelming love. That presence is often identified as Jesus — and, as Miller shows, the presence is identified as Jesus not only by believing Christians who might be expected to see Him but also by atheists, Hindus, Muslims, and nominal skeptics who had every reason to see something else.3 The compatibility Miller documents is not an accident. It is what we would expect if NDEs are, for the most part, real encounters with a real spiritual realm governed by a real risen Christ.
So the posture of this chapter is recovery and rebalance. We have spent the last few chapters sharpening our discernment. Now we open our hands again and say: here are the authors whose work you can safely take home and read with your Bible open, and here is why.
Discernment is not the same as suspicion. Discernment tests, weighs, and receives what is good. Suspicion refuses to receive anything. "Test everything; hold fast what is good" (1 Thessalonians 5:21, ESV) is a two-part command. We often remember only the first half.
Before we walk through specific authors, we need a shared set of criteria. If we judge case by case without a framework, we will simply be reacting to personalities and book covers. That is not discernment; that is aesthetics. So here are seven marks that, taken together, signal an NDE account and an NDE author you can read with reasonable confidence. No single criterion is enough on its own. A trustworthy author will display most or all of them. A problematic author will fail several of them.
The first test is the simplest. What is actually in the NDE? Is Jesus there? Not a vague being of light, not a "divine consciousness," not a generic loving presence that could belong to any religion — but Jesus Himself, identifiable by features consistent with Scripture? Is the cosmology biblical? Does the experience include moral seriousness, a real distinction between right and wrong, a real call to repentance or faith? Or is the content a fog of New Age platitudes about oneness and self-discovery?
As I have argued in earlier chapters, the bare presence of a being of light proves very little. What matters is whether the being is the Christ of Scripture. A trustworthy NDE will feature Jesus in ways that line up with the New Testament portrait: marks of crucifixion on hands and side, radiant glory, overwhelming love, authority, a clear identity rooted in the historical Jesus of Nazareth.4 When the NDE content itself is clearly Christian, one of the biggest worries is already off the table.
Experience and interpretation are two different things, and you cannot read NDE literature well without holding them apart. A person may have a genuine encounter with God and then, afterward, filter that encounter through whatever worldview they brought to it. The same experience can lead one person to Christian faith and another to universalism. So we have to ask: what does the author do with the experience? Do they draw universalist, syncretist, or occult conclusions? Or do they affirm what Scripture teaches about the uniqueness of Christ, the reality of judgment, the authority of the Bible, and the call to repentance and faith?
A person may have had a real heavenly experience and still teach things the Bible contradicts. When that happens, we can honor the experience without accepting the teaching. But the kind of author we are looking for in this chapter is one whose experience and whose interpretation both line up with biblical Christianity.
Jesus said we would know false prophets by their fruits (Matthew 7:16). The same test applies to NDErs. After the experience, what does the author's life look like? Is there evidence of ongoing discipleship — marriage fidelity, local church involvement, humble service, growth in the fruit of the Spirit? Or has the NDE become the basis for a self-promoting ministry, a celebrity platform, or a string of broken relationships? The question is not whether the author is sinless; no one is. The question is whether the trajectory of their life over the years and decades since the experience looks like ordinary Christian discipleship.
I find this criterion particularly important because it is the one that time exposes. Some NDErs look great in their first book and then, twenty years later, reveal that the experience has led them somewhere strange. Others were ordinary Christians before the experience and have simply remained ordinary Christians afterward, just with a story to tell. The long trajectory tells the truth.
A trustworthy NDE author engages Scripture directly and submits their experience to its authority. When their experience seems to conflict with a biblical teaching, they do not say, "Well, the Bible is wrong." They either re-examine their experience, or they re-examine their reading of the Bible, or they acknowledge the tension honestly and wait for more light. They do not claim that their experience supersedes what Scripture has taught the Church for two thousand years.
This is one of the tests that most quickly separates trustworthy authors from the rest. A pastor who had an NDE and now reads the Bible with even greater seriousness is one thing. An NDEr who implies that their experience has given them revelation superior to Scripture is quite another. The New Testament itself warns against this inversion. Even the apostle Paul, who had a vision of Paradise most of us can barely imagine, told the Galatians that if he or an angel from heaven preached a different gospel, that gospel should be rejected (Galatians 1:8–9). Paul submitted his own visions to the gospel. So should any NDEr today.
A real memory, told honestly, tends to be consistent over the years. Small details may shift; a person may remember something new or de-emphasize something old; but the core of the account stays the same. A trustworthy NDE author has told their story in substantially the same way for years, across interviews, books, and sermons, without major revisions that radically change what happened.
When the core content of a testimony changes in significant ways over time — when heaven turns into hell, or one being becomes another, or a plain account gets ornamented with new and dramatic features as the author's platform grows — that is a warning sign. Genuine memories have a stubborn consistency that fabrications and embellishments tend to lack.
Trustworthy NDE authors do not claim too much. They do not say that their experience is universally normative for all believers, that their understanding of heaven is definitive, or that other believers must accept their account as authoritative. They recognize that their experience was a gift given to them, not a revelation binding on the Church. They distinguish what Scripture teaches with certainty from what they saw or heard, which may be partially metaphorical, culturally shaped, or subject to misunderstanding.
The humble author says, "This is what I experienced, to the best of my memory; here is how I understand it in light of Scripture; take what is helpful and test everything against the Bible." The arrogant author says, "I have been to heaven, and I am now qualified to tell you things the Bible did not." The difference matters.
The last criterion is the one most often neglected. A trustworthy NDE author belongs to a local church, sits under pastoral oversight, and does not operate as an independent spiritual authority. They have ordinary Christian brothers and sisters who know them, love them, and are free to correct them. They are not lone prophets broadcasting from a platform with no church attached.
This mark corresponds to a deep biblical pattern. The prophets of Israel were accountable to covenant community. The apostles were accountable to one another and to the broader Church. The New Testament never envisions a Christian teacher who is accountable to no one. When an NDE author operates outside of any real church relationship, and when every criticism of their teaching is framed as persecution, something is wrong.
These seven criteria are not a scoring rubric. Every author will fail one of them somewhere. The question is not whether an author is perfect but whether their overall profile is healthy — content, interpretation, life, Scripture, consistency, humility, accountability. A trustworthy author will land solidly on most of these marks. A problematic author will fail several of them in significant ways.
With these criteria in place, let us now walk through specific authors. I will organize them into two groups: first, experiencers who have written their own accounts; second, researchers and scholars who study NDEs from a Christian frame. A third brief section will address the special case of Colton Burpo's Heaven Is for Real, which requires its own careful treatment.
· · ·
Don Piper is perhaps the best-known Christian NDE author in the English-speaking world. Piper, a Baptist pastor, was driving home from a conference in Texas in January 1989 when an eighteen-wheeler crossed the center line on a rainy bridge and struck his car head-on. EMS personnel at the scene found no pulse and pronounced him dead. For approximately ninety minutes, according to the medical record, he remained clinically dead in the crushed car while first responders waited for the Jaws of Life. During that time another pastor, who arrived at the scene and felt compelled to climb into the wreckage, prayed and sang over Piper's body. Then — as Piper and the other pastor both tell it — Piper came back.5
Piper's account of what happened during those ninety minutes is consistent with biblical teaching. He describes arriving at heaven's gate, being met by a welcoming party of deceased loved ones and spiritually significant figures from his life, hearing music unlike anything on earth, experiencing colors that transcended the earthly palette, and being drawn into the worship of the heavenly company. He does not claim to have been shown things superior to Scripture. He does not claim to have seen the throne of God or received new revelation for the Church. He does not build a theology of heaven out of his experience; he says, in effect, "This is what I saw, and it was consistent with what my Bible had taught me, and it confirmed everything I already believed."6
That humility is, by itself, an important signal. Piper does not treat his experience as a platform for special authority. He treats it as a gift that confirmed his existing pastoral calling. John Burke, in his systematic comparison of NDE accounts with biblical teaching, cites Piper repeatedly as an example of an account whose features align with Scripture.7 Piper's long pastoral ministry in the Southern Baptist tradition, his marriage, and his accountability structures have all remained intact for more than three decades since the accident.
There are a few things to note honestly. Some critics have raised questions about specific details of Piper's account — for example, the exact medical definition of death at the scene, or the fact that the very strong public response to his book has generated imitators who treated his template as a formula. These are fair questions, and Piper has addressed them in interviews and subsequent writings. But the questions are about the edges of the account, not its heart. At the heart, 90 Minutes in Heaven is a biblically consistent, pastorally humble, fruit-bearing Christian testimony. It can be read with confidence.
One further feature of Piper's account is worth naming, because it is rarer than it should be. Piper does not claim that his experience answered every question he had about heaven. He reports what he saw. He declines to speculate beyond it. When pressed over the years to write a sequel with new revelations, he has consistently refused, saying in effect that he has already shared what God gave him and that inventing more would be dishonest. That refusal is, by itself, a very strong authenticity signal. Fabricators keep finding new things to say; honest witnesses tend to keep telling the same story. The contrast between Piper's restraint and the sprawling, ever-expanding corpus of some other NDE figures is one of the cleanest internal tests of credibility.
Piper has also become a generous presence to other Christian NDE authors and researchers in the years since his book appeared. John Burke thanks Piper by name in Imagine Heaven for time spent discussing these topics, reading the manuscript, and writing the foreword — in which Piper himself warns against claims that go beyond what the Bible says, describing his own book as an account that goes no further than what he saw. That kind of cross-pollination — experienced NDErs helping researchers vet new accounts — is part of what builds a healthier Christian conversation around this literature. Piper has been one of its most faithful contributors for nearly two decades.
Piper's book is, for many Christians, the first NDE testimony they read. That is not an accident. Its tone is humble, its content is Christ-centered, and its author does not claim too much. If you are helping a grieving believer begin to explore this literature, Piper is a safe starting point.
Mary Neal is a board-certified orthopedic surgeon and a committed Christian. In 1999, while kayaking on a remote river in Chile, her kayak became pinned underwater and she drowned. She was under water for fifteen minutes and clinically dead for significantly longer. Her account describes leaving her body, being met by spirits she identified as angels or departed loved ones, and being taken to a place of radiant beauty where she encountered Jesus. She was also shown scenes from her own life and, she says, was told future events including the death of her son — a prediction that tragically came true some years later.8
Neal's theology is broadly Christian. She affirms Jesus as the Savior, emphasizes the reality of God's sovereign goodness even in suffering, and speaks about heaven in ways that align with biblical teaching. Some readers have noted areas of ambiguity in her writing — places where her language about "the Universe" or "energy" could be read through more than one lens. Those observations are fair. But when pressed, Neal consistently identifies the being at the heart of her experience as Jesus, and her overall theological profile, while not as tightly evangelical as Piper's, remains within the bounds of biblical Christianity.
Her second book, 7 Lessons from Heaven, is in some ways better than the first. There she draws out practical lessons from her experience for Christian living — the priority of prayer, the goodness of God's providence, the urgency of evangelism, the reality of spiritual battle, and the promise of resurrection hope. Her continuing medical practice, her active church involvement, and the quiet integrity of her public life all support the authenticity of the account.
Read Neal with appreciative discernment. She is one of the most credentialed and articulate Christian NDE voices in print. Where she is clearest, she is wonderful; where she is ambiguous, keep your Bible open.
Two further elements of Neal's account deserve mention. The first is her life review. During her experience Neal describes being shown scenes from her past, but with a depth unusual in NDE reports: she saw how each decision rippled out through other lives, across many degrees of separation, in ways she could not have known in ordinary life. Miller cites this as one of the most striking examples of the cosmic-interconnection element that sometimes appears in life reviews, and he notes that Neal frames it theologically as a window into the all-knowing care of her heavenly Father, rather than as a karmic or New Age teaching.8 That framing is biblically clean and pastorally important.
The second element is harder. During her NDE, Neal says she was told that her oldest son would die young. Years later, he did — in a tragic accident. Her response to that grief is, in my view, one of the most theologically mature things any NDEr has written. She did not claim to have been given the gift of prophecy. She did not monetize the prediction. She walked through the loss as a grieving mother held by a sovereign and good God. Her second book, 7 Lessons from Heaven, draws on that experience of loss in ways that feel earned rather than performed. It is a book I have recommended to grieving Christian parents more than once.
Howard Storm's story may be the most remarkable conversion narrative in the NDE literature of the last fifty years. Storm was a tenured art professor, a committed atheist, and — by his own account — a proud, angry, self-centered man. In 1985, during a trip to Paris, he suffered a perforated duodenum and lay dying in a French hospital for hours while waiting for surgery. During that time he had one of the most well-documented distressing NDEs in the literature. He left his body, followed shadowy figures into a place of deepening darkness, and was attacked by malevolent beings who tore at his flesh.9
As the attack grew unbearable, a fragment of a song he had learned as a child came back to him — a hymn about Jesus. He cried out the name of Jesus. A light appeared. Jesus Himself, by Storm's account, came to him in that dark place, lifted him out, held him, and spoke with him for what felt like a long time. Storm was then shown scenes from his life, given the chance to ask many questions, and finally returned to his body with an assignment: to live differently.10
Storm's conversion was total. He left the art faculty, attended seminary, was ordained, and pastored United Church of Christ congregations for the remainder of his working life. He has spoken of his experience with substantial consistency across decades of interviews, books, and sermons. J. Steve Miller points to Storm as an example of a prior atheist whose NDE encounter with Jesus resulted in a dramatic shift in both belief and vocation — a change in life that is hard to explain by any appeal to prior expectations.11
A candid note. Storm is a UCC pastor, and the UCC's theological positions are notably diverse; his affiliation does not by itself signal evangelical orthodoxy, and some of his later teaching on universal reconciliation and spiritual questions has been critiqued by evangelicals. This is worth flagging. But the original account of his NDE in My Descent into Death is remarkably consistent with biblical Christianity — sin is real, hell is real, Christ is the Savior, grace is unearned, and the response required is trust in Jesus. Read the original book with confidence. Evaluate Storm's later teachings with the same careful discernment you would bring to any author. The core testimony has been a powerful instrument of the Spirit in bringing many skeptics to Christ.
What makes Storm's testimony so evidentially useful is the clean before-and-after contrast. He did not go into his experience a believer. He went in an atheist — not the quiet kind who privately hopes there is no God, but the loud kind who argued against Christianity in the classroom. He had the worldview, the education, and the intellectual habits of someone who would naturally dismiss an NDE as hallucination. And yet he came back a different man. Miller notes that Storm's case is one of several he uses to counter the objection that NDEs are simply products of prior expectations: atheists do not expect to find Jesus at the bottom of a dark experience, and yet that is precisely what Storm reports finding.11 The experience explains the conversion; ordinary prior belief does not.
Storm also provides one of the most candid accounts of distressing NDEs in print. His early chapters describe in painful detail what it was like to be pulled toward and then into a place of darkness, to recognize that the beings drawing him were not his friends, to feel shame and terror at what he was becoming, and then to be rescued only because a fragment of the gospel he had heard as a child surfaced in his mind. Many readers have told Storm that his story helped them make sense of their own distressing experiences, which they had been too ashamed to share. Burke notes that because Storm has been willing to speak openly about what the darker end of the NDE spectrum is like, he has become a trusted confidant for other experiencers who carry those memories in private.10 Pastorally, that gift is enormous.
I give the same recommendation to Storm's book that I give to almost no other title in this chapter: buy it, even though some of his later framing will need discernment. The core gospel moment in its middle chapters — the cry of a dying atheist and the rescue of the risen Christ — is worth the price of admission.
Ian McCormack's story has a quality that sets it apart: it is almost too simple to argue with. McCormack was a young New Zealand surfer, not a Christian, traveling through Indonesia, Africa, and Asia in search of waves and adventure. In 1982, while night-diving on the reefs off the coast of Mauritius, he was stung four times by box jellyfish — a sting so toxic that a single one is usually fatal. He made it to shore, was transported to a hospital by friends, and died there.12
During the short time between his stings and his death, the face of his mother came into his mind. His mother had prayed for him for years. A verse she had taught him — "Call upon the name of the Lord and you will be saved" — surfaced in his memory. In the hospital, already dying, he cried out to God. In the darkness after death, as he tells it, he met a figure of light so brilliant that he could not bear it, and he knew the light was God. Jesus spoke to him, forgave him, and showed him a glimpse of heaven — and then sent him back to earth to tell others.13
McCormack's testimony has been told with remarkable consistency for more than forty years. He entered Christian ministry, became an evangelist, married, raised a family, and continues to teach across multiple continents. His theology is straightforwardly biblical. He calls people to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ. He does not build elaborate structures of heavenly geography on his experience. He tells a simple story and draws simple conclusions from it. Burke's Imagine Heaven references McCormack at multiple points as an example of a coherent, consistent, Christ-centered NDE.14
Of all the NDE accounts I have read, McCormack's is the one I recommend most readily to skeptics. If a friend says, "But aren't all NDErs already religious people?" McCormack is the counterexample in a single sentence. He is a genuinely trustworthy voice in this literature.
The specific content of McCormack's experience also lines up with the biblical pattern in ways that matter. He describes first a place of disorienting darkness, cold, and the awareness of an encroaching evil presence. He could feel that he was not alone there, and that the company he was in was not friendly. Then, after he cried out to God, a light entered the darkness and began to draw him upward. The light, he says, was so intense that he could not look directly into it — a description that echoes Paul's experience on the Damascus road (Acts 9:3–9) and the description of the risen Christ in Revelation 1. In the presence of that light, McCormack's life played before him, and he felt the love of God and the weight of his own wrongdoing at the same time.13
What he did with the experience afterward is just as important as the experience itself. He did not build a celebrity platform. He did not write a series of ever-more-elaborate sequels. He told the story, entered ministry, and has spent the subsequent decades calling people to faith in Christ. His testimony is now freely available online and has been watched by many millions around the world. The consistency of the telling, the evangelical content of the call, and the ordinary-pastor shape of his post-NDE life are all positive indicators. When Burke introduces McCormack to his readers, he does so alongside the other accounts of conversion that include direct encounter with darkness and then with the light of Christ — a biblical pattern, not a New Age one.12
Dean Braxton's experience differs from the others in both flavor and intensity. Braxton, a committed Christian of Pentecostal background, was clinically dead for more than an hour during a surgical procedure in 2006 for a kidney stone complication. His account is vivid, detailed, and unmistakably charismatic in its register. He describes standing in the throne room of God, seeing angels and saints in worship, and experiencing depths of the love of Christ that he says cannot be described in any earthly language.15
Burke quotes Braxton's account at length in Imagine Heaven as one of his illustrations of what the throne scene of heavenly worship looks like from the inside.16 The content of Braxton's NDE is biblically consistent. Jesus is central. The Father is worshiped. The Holy Spirit is acknowledged. The blood of Christ is honored. Angels behave the way angels behave in Scripture. Saints worship rather than being worshiped. The moral architecture — holiness, love, judgment, mercy — is unmistakably biblical.
Readers from non-charismatic backgrounds may find some of Braxton's descriptions unfamiliar. The intensity of the emotional experience, the vividness of the sensory details, and the Pentecostal frame in which he tells the story may feel foreign. That is a matter of style, not of substance. The substance is biblically sound. Braxton has built a Christ-centered teaching ministry, has not strayed into the speculative territory that has tripped up lesser authors, and has not claimed authority beyond the testimony God gave him. Read him with an openness to a different register, and you will find a genuine brother describing what he was privileged to glimpse.
A note for cessationist readers, who may be uncomfortable with any account that speaks of heavenly tongues, continuing spiritual gifts, or direct experiences of the Spirit's power. I would encourage such readers not to dismiss Braxton's account on those grounds alone. The central features of his testimony are not distinctive to Pentecostal theology. The throne room he describes is the throne room of Revelation 4 and 5. The Jesus he encounters is the Jesus of the Gospels, not a different Christ. The love he reports is the love the apostle John says passes knowledge (Ephesians 3:19). The charismatic register is the frame, not the message. The message is straightforwardly biblical. Cessationists can read Braxton the way they would read a warm Pentecostal brother from another congregation — learning from the testimony while not feeling obligated to adopt the style.
Jim Woodford's story is one of conversion as much as one of heaven. Woodford was a successful Canadian businessman and professional pilot — thoughtful, cultured, and functionally secular. In 2006 he suffered a serious medical emergency and was clinically dead for approximately eleven hours. During that time, he had a layered experience that included elements of both distressing encounter and heavenly glimpse. He met Jesus, heard the voice of God, and was sent back with a new vocation as a Christian witness.17
What commends Woodford is the humility of his telling. He writes as a man who was changed rather than as a man who received privileged information. His account has been told consistently for nearly two decades. He writes the foreword to Shaun Tabatt's The NDE Conspiracy, and in it he frames his own experience as a gift God gave him for the purpose of calling others to Christ — not as a platform for teaching heavenly geography or building a celebrity platform.18 His theological accountability, his church involvement, and his ongoing partnership with discerning Christian voices like Tabatt are all positive indicators. Read him with confidence.
Woodford's account also includes an element that makes it especially useful for apologetic purposes: a period of distressing experience before the encounter with Christ. As a pilot, Woodford had spent his adult life at altitude, and he was not a man easily frightened by unfamiliar places. Yet what he describes at the outset of his NDE is not a pleasant drift into light. It is darkness, disorientation, and the presence of beings he recognized as hostile. Only when he cried out — again, using the name of Jesus — did the trajectory of the experience change. That pattern appears often enough in the accounts of former skeptics (Storm, McCormack, Woodford) that it deserves to be noticed. The Jesus whom these men encountered was not a figure they constructed from prior longing. He was the name that broke the hold of the darkness on them.
Woodford's life since the experience has been ordinary in the best sense. He and Tabatt have partnered on multiple projects. He has spoken at churches. He has not set up an empire. The platform he has is modest, focused, and pointed at Christ. That is what a trustworthy post-NDE life tends to look like.
Ivan Tuttle's account is important for a reason that will matter to some readers more than others: it includes genuine experience of both hell and heaven. Tuttle was an ordinary American businessman, not a believer at the time of his experience. He was declared dead at a hospital. During that time he describes first descending into a place of terrifying darkness and distress — his life played before him, his decisions were laid bare, and he understood that he was in the process of being lost — and then being rescued out of that place by Christ and shown the goodness of heaven.19
Tabatt, who has interviewed Tuttle multiple times, closes a key chapter of The NDE Conspiracy with a prayer Tuttle has used at the end of his own testimony — a clear call to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ.20 Tuttle's theology is evangelical. His account has been told consistently over many years. His emphasis on the reality of the lost state and the graciousness of Christ's rescue is a needed voice in a literature where distressing NDEs are often softened or reinterpreted. Read him where the biblical seriousness of judgment and the gospel call need to be heard together.
Randy Kay is a former biotech executive whose experience of clinical death led to a dramatic deepening of his Christian faith. Kay has since become a prolific voice in the NDE community, partnering with Shaun Tabatt on several volumes of collected NDE testimonies and leading what has grown into a significant ministry platform.21 Kay writes the introduction to Tabatt's The NDE Conspiracy, framing the discernment task as a partnership: testifying to what God has done while refusing to accept every testimony uncritically.22
Kay's teaching is biblically grounded, evangelical in content, and consistently Christ-centered. The collaborative books he has produced with Tabatt are generally useful, though — like any anthology — they mix accounts of varying reliability, and the reader should bring the seven-test framework from Chapter 10 of this book to each individual story. Read Kay's own testimony with confidence; read the collections he curates with discerning hospitality.
One thing I appreciate about the Kay–Tabatt partnership is that each serves as a check on the other. Kay is more often the warm interviewer, willing to receive a testimony at face value; Tabatt is more often the discerning editor, raising the theological questions and insisting on scriptural testing. Together they model a conversation that the broader NDE community needs. When someone brings a new account to the 2 Christian Dudes podcast, the account is received with sympathy and also pressed with honest questions. That is the right posture. Read Kay for the sympathy; read Tabatt for the discernment; read them together for the full picture.
Several additional names appear often enough in the literature that they deserve more than a passing mention. Each of these authors adds texture to the broader Christian NDE conversation, and each has a book worth having on the shelf.
Marv Besteman. A retired Michigan bank president, Besteman wrote My Journey to Heaven after an NDE during surgery. Burke cites him often in Imagine Heaven as an example of a simple, biblically consistent testimony: a welcoming committee of deceased loved ones, an encounter with angels, the presence of Christ, and a return to earth with a renewed gospel urgency.23 Besteman's book is not flashy. He was not a pastor or a philosopher. He was an ordinary Christian businessman who had a real experience and told it plainly. That plainness is part of its credibility.
Captain Dale Black. A commercial pilot who survived a catastrophic plane crash as a young man in the 1960s, Black describes a brief but intense heavenly experience in Flight to Heaven. Burke cites him repeatedly alongside Piper and Besteman as a consistent voice on the beauty and music of heaven.24 What sets Black apart is the long gap between the experience and the book. He did not write it immediately. He lived with the memory for decades, processed it through a stable Christian life, and only later put it into print. That lengthy seasoning is itself a signal of authenticity. Fabricators tend to write quickly while the emotional heat is high. Honest witnesses often wait.
Crystal McVea. A young Oklahoma woman whose account Burke uses as a major case study throughout Imagine Heaven. McVea describes being met by Jesus Himself during a medical crisis and having her life utterly rearranged as a result.25 Her book Waking Up in Heaven (co-authored with Alex Tresniowski) was widely read in evangelical circles and has remained in print. Her post-NDE life — marriage, family, local church involvement, a modest speaking ministry — fits the ordinary-Christian trajectory we have been looking for throughout this chapter.
Samaa Habib. A former Muslim from Kazakhstan, Habib describes in Face to Face with Jesus an NDE following a terrorist bombing at the church she had begun attending. During the experience she encountered Christ, was drawn into a profound sense of His love, and returned with a renewed call to evangelism in the Muslim world. Burke quotes her account warmly as one of the more striking examples of a Jesus-encounter in a person with no prior Christian cultural background.26 Her story is important apologetically precisely because she did not come from a Christian culture in which a vision of Jesus would be the expected outcome of a trauma.
George Ritchie. Though his book Return from Tomorrow was first published in 1978 and is older than most of the other titles in this section, Ritchie's account deserves mention because it was one of the first widely-read NDE accounts in the modern era and because Raymond Moody's original research was in part sparked by conversations with Ritchie. Ritchie was a committed Christian throughout his life, and his account describes being guided by Christ Himself through scenes of both heavenly worship and something resembling hellish states of the soul. Tabatt cites Ritchie as a historically significant early Christian NDE voice.51
None of these authors is above careful reading. Each of them has a story to tell, not a system to teach. That is part of why they are trustworthy.
· · ·
Experiencers tell their own stories. Researchers and scholars do something different. They gather many accounts, compare them, test them, and evaluate them against a theological and philosophical frame. If you want to read NDE literature responsibly, you need both. The experiencers give you the texture; the researchers give you the shape.
Here are the authors I would put in every Christian student's hands if I could.
If I had to recommend one researcher on NDE and DBE literature to a serious Christian reader today, it would be J. Steve Miller. Miller is a longtime professor at Kennesaw State University, a conservative evangelical, and the author of the most rigorous current apologetic engaging NDE and DBE evidence from a biblical frame. His two major recent works — Is Christianity Compatible with Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? and Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1 — together offer the most important theological and empirical analysis of this literature available to English-reading Christians.27
What sets Miller apart is the combination of three qualities that rarely appear together. First, he is genuinely rigorous. He has worked through the data, read the secular research, and engaged the critical literature. Second, he is theologically conservative. He writes as a Christian who takes Scripture as the final authority, not as a spiritual-but-not-religious enthusiast who happens to use Christian language. Third, he is fair-minded. He does not overclaim. He distinguishes what the evidence supports from what it does not. He acknowledges the ambiguities.
Miller's central argument — that the core content of most NDEs and DBEs is surprisingly compatible with mainstream biblical themes — is developed with careful attention to the data. He shows that the presence of Jesus in NDE accounts across different religious backgrounds is one of the most striking features of the literature and one of the least expected under a purely cultural explanation.28 He also acknowledges the special issues where NDE accounts diverge from biblical teaching, and he addresses those issues honestly rather than pretending they do not exist.29
Miller's Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1 is the most thorough treatment of DBEs from a Christian frame in print. He walks through multiple lines of evidence — terminal lucidity, after-death communications, shared death experiences, and more — showing the cumulative case for consciousness persisting beyond bodily death.30 For a serious student who wants the research argument made rigorously, this is the book to buy.
Highest recommendation. Buy his books. Read them twice.
Shaun Tabatt's The NDE Conspiracy is, in many ways, the book most closely aligned with the project of the volume you are now reading. Tabatt, a publisher and podcaster who has spent the last decade interviewing NDErs across many traditions, has watched the literature from the inside. He knows the field. He knows its stars. He knows its troubles. He writes as a concerned Christian witness who wants to help believers navigate the terrain with wisdom.31
What makes Tabatt's book distinctive is its willingness to name names. He does not pretend that all NDEs are the same. He does not dismiss the literature. But he also does not accept every testimony uncritically. He identifies a conspiracy — not a paranoid, everybody-is-lying conspiracy, but a theological conspiracy in the older sense of the word: a coordinated effort of deceiving spirits to mislead human hearts about the reality of Christ.32 He provides a nine-point discernment framework, walks through major categories of problematic content, and points readers toward trustworthy voices.
Tabatt writes accessibly, pastorally, and with clear biblical conviction. He is the kind of writer the NDE community has needed for a long time: a friendly, fair critic from inside the house. Essential reading for anyone who wants a biblically balanced orientation to the literature. I cite him throughout this book precisely because his framework is so useful.
Michael Sabom was one of the very first medical professionals to study NDEs empirically, and he did so from an explicitly Christian frame. A cardiologist by training and an elder in the Presbyterian Church in America, Sabom's initial research in the 1970s and 1980s established many of the methodological standards the field still uses. Light and Death, published in 1998, presents his second major project — the Atlanta Study.33
The Atlanta Study examined 160 patients, of whom forty-seven had had NDEs. The study is especially important because it combined first-person interviews with detailed medical documentation of the cardiac and neurological events surrounding the experiences. The best-known case in the study is that of Pam Reynolds, who had a deeply documented NDE during a surgical procedure in which her brain was monitored, her body was cooled, her blood was drained, and all measurable brain activity was absent — yet she returned with accurate descriptions of events that occurred during that period.34
Sabom is not just a careful researcher; he is a thoughtful Christian. His chapter on the church's historical discomfort with NDE testimonies, his treatment of distressing NDEs, and his concluding chapter on the biblical framework for interpreting NDE data all reward careful reading.35 Some of his methodological instincts have been refined by later research, but his basic combination of medical rigor and biblical commitment remains rare and valuable. Read him for the Atlanta Study itself and for the example of how a Christian doctor can engage this literature without losing either his stethoscope or his Bible.
John Burke is an evangelical pastor who founded Gateway Church in Austin, Texas, and whose Imagine Heaven has probably done more than any other single book in the last decade to introduce thoughtful Christians to a broad range of NDE accounts read through a biblical lens. Burke has systematically compared the common features of NDE reports with the biblical teaching on heaven and the afterlife, and the cumulative case he builds is striking.36
The book is blurbed and endorsed by figures including J. P. Moreland, Gary Habermas, and Lee Strobel. Don Piper writes the foreword, noting that what NDErs have reported is remarkably consistent with what the Bible says about heaven.37 Burke organizes his treatment thematically, walking the reader through topics like the welcoming committee, the life review, the encounter with Jesus, the beauty of heaven, and the consistency of NDE accounts across different times and places.38
Burke is a pastor, not primarily a scholar, and a careful reader will note that he is more willing than this book would be to accept certain popular NDE accounts at face value. He is, in general, an appreciative reader rather than a suspicious one. That appreciative posture is his greatest strength and his notable limitation. Read him alongside Tabatt and Miller, who bring more critical instincts to the same material. Together the three provide a balanced education. Read alone, Burke may leave the reader without all the discernment tools this book has been trying to build. But his book is genuinely trustworthy, warm, deeply biblical in its frame, and appropriately cautious where caution is needed.
Gary Habermas and J. P. Moreland are two of the most respected evangelical philosophers alive. Habermas is best known for his work on the resurrection of Jesus; Moreland is best known for his defense of substance dualism and his philosophical work on the soul. Their book Beyond Death: Exploring the Evidence for Immortality is the best single introduction to the philosophical, biblical, and empirical case for life after death from a conservative Christian perspective.39
The book treats the biblical teaching on the intermediate state, the philosophical arguments for the soul, the evidence from near-death experiences, and the case for the resurrection of Christ as a unified whole. It is more scholarly in register than most of the books in this chapter, but it is not inaccessible. A serious college student can work through it. For readers who want the NDE evidence set within a broader philosophical and theological defense of the afterlife, it is the single most useful volume.
Moreland in particular has written extensively on the soul and its relation to the body — work that provides the philosophical scaffolding on which the NDE evidence rests. If consciousness can survive the death of the body, NDEs are not surprising. If consciousness cannot, NDEs are impossible. Moreland's philosophical work helps readers see why substance dualism is a defensible and even preferable position.40
Maurice Rawlings was a cardiologist and evangelical Christian who, in the 1970s and 1980s, documented what no one else in the field was willing to document at the time: the existence of distressing NDEs. Early NDE literature, following Raymond Moody, had emphasized almost exclusively the positive experiences. Rawlings, who resuscitated many cardiac arrest patients in his clinical practice, found that a significant number of patients reported terrifying experiences — descending into dark places, encountering malevolent beings, feeling themselves lost. He noticed that patients tended to forget or suppress these experiences quickly, which meant researchers who interviewed them days or weeks later often missed them. Rawlings interviewed patients immediately upon resuscitation and found the hellish experiences were real and not rare.41
Some of Rawlings's specific interpretations and his preacher's register have been critiqued, both by secular researchers and by evangelicals. His methodology was not always what later researchers would require. But the core of his work — the insistence that distressing NDEs exist, that they matter, and that they cannot be explained away — has been abundantly confirmed by the later work of Nancy Evans Bush, Barbara Rommer, and others, even when those later researchers have drawn different theological conclusions. Rawlings's core research is trustworthy and important. Read him to recover the biblical seriousness of the reality of judgment and the urgency of the gospel call.
One last "source" in this section is not a single author but a group. Sabom's Atlanta Study documented forty-seven NDErs, of whom a substantial majority were ordinary American Christians whose NDEs deepened rather than displaced their existing faith. Sabom walks the reader through cases like Gloria, Darrell, Gene, and others whose experiences brought them closer to Christ, confirmed rather than displaced their church involvement, and produced measurable growth in what researchers call "intrinsic faith."42 When you read Sabom's Atlanta Study, you are not reading any one experiencer's book; you are reading the collective witness of dozens of people whose experiences were carefully documented and whose theological conclusions were tested. That cohort, taken together, is one of the most important bodies of testimony in the field.
· · ·
No chapter on trustworthy Christian NDE literature would be complete without addressing Heaven Is for Real, the 2010 book by Todd Burpo, co-written about his son Colton's NDE during an emergency appendectomy at age three. The book sold more than ten million copies, was adapted into a successful film, and is probably the NDE book most Christians have read or watched.43 It deserves, and requires, careful and charitable treatment.
The account is broadly Christian in content. Colton describes meeting Jesus, seeing angels, sitting on Jesus's lap, meeting his sister who had been miscarried before his birth (and whose existence Colton had never been told about), meeting his grandfather whom he had never known, and seeing God the Father. He reports details about the family's life that he could not have known by ordinary means — for example, what his parents were doing in separate rooms of the hospital during his surgery.44 Todd Burpo, Colton's father, is a pastor, and in the book he describes how his son's account unfolded gradually over months and years, with new details emerging in ordinary moments of daily life rather than in formal interviews.
Miller notes that Todd Burpo himself says his son's experience solidified his own pastoral faith — he had been a Christian and a pastor for much of his life, but his son's experience gave him a knowing where before there had only been believing.45 That is, on the face of it, a good fruit. The book has strengthened many Christians' hope in heaven.
At the same time, there are fair critical observations. Some have noted that the account is mediated through the father's pastoral voice, which may have shaped the telling in ways that go beyond what a three-year-old would spontaneously produce. Others have raised concerns about specific elements — the description of Jesus's physical appearance, the way certain details were revealed — and have suggested that the account blends genuine memory with imaginative reconstruction. Still others have simply noted that the commercial success of the book created a temptation toward embellishment that may have shaped the later retellings, even if the core is authentic.
My own reading is this. The broad shape of the Burpo account is biblically consistent. The family's long trajectory since the book appeared has been faithful — ordinary pastoral ministry, continued church involvement, and a refusal by the Burpos to build a speaking empire on the book's success. The details that are hardest to explain naturalistically (what Colton knew about his sister, what he knew about events he could not have witnessed) are the details most worth taking seriously. Some of the more decorative elements — specific descriptions of Jesus's eyes or the colors of angels' wings — are where appreciative discernment is most needed. None of them contradict Scripture; but none of them are necessary for the account to be meaningful.
I recommend reading Heaven Is for Real as a real testimony that has blessed many, and also as a reminder of why appreciative discernment is always the right posture. Do not build your theology of heaven on its details. Do not dismiss the account because some details are uncertain. Hold it the way you would hold any other testimony of God's kindness to a family in crisis: with gratitude, with prayer, and with your Bible open.
The Burpo book became a cultural moment in evangelical life. Many people you know have read it, watched the movie, and shared it with friends. When you talk to them, do not start by listing your reservations. Start by honoring what the Lord has done — the strengthening of their hope, the comforting of their grief, the deepening of their trust that the God who made them does not abandon them at death. Offer discernment as a supplement, not a correction. Pastoral wisdom leads with gratitude.
· · ·
Before we close with the practical reading plan, it is worth standing back and asking what these trustworthy authors share in common. The seven criteria we opened with gave us a framework for evaluation; the author surveys gave us specific data points. But the cumulative pattern is worth naming.
First, in every case I have described above, the central figure of the experience is Jesus Himself — not a generic light, not an impersonal consciousness, not a member of a pantheon. Piper worships with the heavenly company that is gathered around Jesus. Neal meets Jesus in a life review that reveals His knowledge of her whole life. Storm is rescued by the name of Jesus cried out in the dark. McCormack is drawn upward into the light of Jesus. Braxton stands in the throne room where Jesus reigns. Woodford hears the voice of Christ redirecting the course of his life. Tuttle is pulled out of a place of terror by Jesus. Whether the NDEr began as an atheist, a nominal Christian, a Muslim, or a committed believer, the common center is the Christ of Scripture. That convergence is one of the strongest internal features of the trustworthy testimony tradition.
Second, in every case above, the experiencer submits the experience to Scripture rather than placing the experience above Scripture. Piper repeatedly emphasizes that what he saw was consistent with what his Bible already taught. Neal writes her books with scriptural frames in view. Storm, even in his distressing NDE, is drawn back to the Jesus of a childhood hymn. Braxton interprets the throne room through Revelation. McCormack closes every testimony with a call to believe the biblical gospel. The experience, in each case, is the servant of the written Word, not a rival to it.
Third, every one of these authors has lived a subsequent life that an ordinary Christian congregation would recognize as discipleship. Marriages have stayed intact. Local churches have been loved. Ministries have remained modest. Books have not multiplied endlessly. The aftermath fits the pattern Jesus described when He said that good trees bear good fruit over time (Matthew 7:17–18). The fruit test is passed.
Fourth, none of the authors above claims to be a prophet or a new source of binding revelation for the Church. Each insists, in various words, that their experience was a personal gift rather than a new public oracle. That self-limitation is theologically vital. The Christian tradition has always distinguished between private experience of God, which is common and welcomed, and public revelation binding on the Church, which was completed in Christ and the apostolic writings. Trustworthy NDE authors stay on the private side of that line.
Fifth, every one of the authors above has operated with some form of accountability — local churches, denominational structures, editorial oversight, pastoral friendships, or all of the above. None of them has set up as a lone prophet broadcasting from a private mountain. When accountability fails, trouble tends to follow. When it is present, drift is much less likely.
Christ-centered content. Scripture-submitted interpretation. Disciple-shaped aftermath. Humble self-limitation. Real accountability. When you see these five together in an NDE author's work and life, you are almost certainly looking at a testimony the Lord has given to build up His Church. When any of them are missing, the need for discernment rises.
· · ·
Everything I have said in this chapter is an invitation to confidence. But confidence is not the same as credulity, and even the most trustworthy NDE author should be read with an active mind and an open Bible. Here are five specific practices I would commend to every Christian reader of this literature.
This is not a figure of speech. When you read an NDE account, whether from Piper or Neal or Storm, keep your Bible within arm's reach. When the author describes heaven, compare their description to Revelation 21 and 22, to Isaiah 60, to 2 Corinthians 12, to the gospel accounts of the risen Jesus. When the author describes an encounter with Jesus, compare the description to the Christ you meet in the Gospels and in Revelation 1 and 5. The practice of comparison is not hostile; it is how the Berean Christians were commended for receiving Paul's teaching (Acts 17:11). If it was right for them to check Paul's words against Scripture, it is surely right for us to check an NDEr's words the same way.
Apply the seven tests from Chapter 10 to every account. Even the best authors will include claims that need testing. Some claims will pass easily. Others will fall into a middle category where the Bible does not speak directly — and in that case, appropriate humility is to hold the claim loosely. Still other claims will, upon testing, reveal themselves as inconsistent with Scripture, and those claims you set aside without embarrassment. The author may be right about many things and wrong about this one thing. That is normal. We do this with every Christian teacher, not only with NDErs.
Ian McCormack is a brother. Don Piper is a brother. Mary Neal is a sister. Jim Woodford is a brother. They are not prophets. They did not receive binding revelation for the Church. They are ordinary believers to whom an extraordinary thing happened. The distinction matters because some readers, overwhelmed by the vividness of an NDE account, begin to treat the experiencer as something more than a fellow disciple. That is a mistake. It is a mistake for the experiencer's own spiritual health, and it is a mistake for the reader's. Love them, thank God for them, and read their books — but do not idolize them.
Every author in this chapter has said something I would push back on. Every one of them. That is true of every author you love — of every pastor, every theologian, every friend. Recognizing this should not shake your confidence in their overall trustworthiness. It should simply remind you that trust is not the same as agreement on every point. A trustworthy author is one whose overall profile is healthy, not one who is infallible. Once you can hold that distinction, you will read more widely and more peacefully.
The final practice is the deepest. Your primary loyalty as a Christian reader is to Scripture, not to any NDEr, any pastor, any researcher, or any theologian. When an NDEr's testimony contradicts Scripture, Scripture wins. When an NDEr's testimony confirms Scripture, rejoice and take heart. When an NDEr's testimony goes beyond Scripture into territory Scripture does not address, hold it loosely and do not build on it. This is not a severe posture. It is simply Christian. Paul himself, who had an experience most NDErs would envy — caught up to the third heaven, hearing words that cannot be told (2 Corinthians 12:1–4) — submitted his visions to the gospel he had received and wrote the Galatian church that any teaching contrary to that gospel, even from an angel of heaven, should be rejected (Galatians 1:8). If Paul submitted his vision to Scripture, so do we.46
· · ·
Given everything above, what should you actually buy? Here is a suggested reading plan for the Christian reader who wants to engage NDE literature well. I have divided it into four phases, each designed to build on the last.
Begin with Shaun Tabatt's The NDE Conspiracy. It gives you the discernment framework you will use for everything else. Then read J. Steve Miller's Is Christianity Compatible with Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? for the theological and empirical shape of the compatibility argument. Then read John Burke's Imagine Heaven for the broad survey of NDE accounts read biblically. These three together will give you a working map of the territory.
Now read specific accounts. Don Piper's 90 Minutes in Heaven is the natural starting point. Ian McCormack's testimony, available in book and video form, is the best single conversion account in the literature. Howard Storm's My Descent into Death will stretch you — especially the opening chapters on the distressing portion of his NDE — but it is worth every uncomfortable page. Mary Neal's To Heaven and Back and 7 Lessons from Heaven add a medical professional's voice. Dean Braxton's In Heaven! adds a charismatic register. You will have read the core of the evangelical NDE library.
For readers who want the empirical and theological argument at research level, turn to Michael Sabom's Light and Death, Habermas and Moreland's Beyond Death, and Miller's Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1. These three together give you the medical, philosophical, and empirical argument at a level sufficient for serious study or teaching.
For the distressing side of the literature, read Maurice Rawlings's Beyond Death's Door and Ivan Tuttle's A Journey to Hell, Heaven, and Back. These restore the biblical seriousness of the reality of judgment that some softer NDE books lose. For further testimonies, explore the collections Shaun Tabatt and Randy Kay have produced together, and read Jim Woodford, Captain Dale Black, Marv Besteman, and Crystal McVea as time allows. Each will add texture without adding confusion.
If someone gave you a gift card today and told you to spend it on NDE literature, this is where I would start: Tabatt, The NDE Conspiracy; Miller, Is Christianity Compatible?; Burke, Imagine Heaven; Sabom, Light and Death; and Piper, 90 Minutes in Heaven. Those five books, carefully read with your Bible open, will give you a better grounding in this literature than most pastors currently have.
One question that sometimes comes up when people read my recommendations is: where does the broader scholarly work on the soul, the intermediate state, and the philosophy of mind fit into all this? The short answer is that it fits as background. You do not need to have read Moreland's philosophy of mind or Cooper's biblical anthropology to benefit from Don Piper's testimony. But if you want to understand why Christians across two thousand years have found NDE-style reports plausible rather than impossible, those scholars provide the frame.
John W. Cooper's Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting is the standard treatment of biblical anthropology in dialogue with modern physicalist and dualist alternatives. Cooper argues for what he calls "holistic dualism" — the view that human beings are unified body-soul wholes but that the soul can, by God's grace, persist between death and resurrection.47 That view is the theological foundation on which NDE testimony rests. If human beings have no soul that can persist apart from the body, NDEs are impossible. If human beings have a soul that persists, NDEs are exactly the sort of phenomenon we would expect at the edge of death.
Joshua Farris's An Introduction to Theological Anthropology extends this conversation into recent analytic philosophy, drawing especially on the work of Moreland and others to show how substance dualism remains a defensible position in the philosophy of mind.48 Michael Wilkinson's Crowned with Glory and Honor makes a specifically Chalcedonian argument for why the historic Christian confession of Christ's two natures requires that human beings have immaterial souls — and why the risen Christ whom NDErs encounter is the same incarnate Jesus who walked the roads of Galilee.49 These are not books about NDEs, strictly speaking. But they are the scholarly neighborhood in which NDE research makes sense.
Jeffrey Long, the medical oncologist who founded the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation, has also contributed valuable empirical work — including the large-scale study he calls the God Study — that documents the consistency of divine encounters across thousands of NDE accounts.50 Long is a complicated figure (his theological framework is universalist, which is why he also appears in the next chapter), but his empirical findings on the consistency of divine encounters in NDEs are genuinely valuable and worth engaging critically. Read him for the data, not for the theology.
· · ·
The authors I have recommended in this chapter have been, I believe, a gift to the Church. Their experiences have brought many to Christ. Their books have strengthened the faith of many believers. Their witness has provided a kind of secondary, empirical support to the Bible's central teaching that our God is not a distant abstraction but a real, personal, loving Savior who meets His people at the edge of death and welcomes them home. When I read Don Piper's description of heavenly music, or Ian McCormack's description of Jesus calling him out of darkness, or Howard Storm's description of crying out the name of Jesus in a dark place and being rescued, I am not reading something that competes with Scripture. I am reading something that exists because Scripture is true.
There is no danger in reading these books. There is only the ordinary danger of reading anything: the danger of reading without your Bible open, without testing what you read, without bringing it into the community of your local church. Read these authors the way you would read any other trustworthy Christian — J. I. Packer, or Elisabeth Elliot, or Dallas Willard, or Timothy Keller. With appreciation. With gratitude. With the occasional question mark in the margin where something is unclear. With your own ongoing life of discipleship as the frame in which everything else is held.
If you have been reading this book straight through and are now feeling weary with discernment, this chapter is an invitation to rest. Most NDE accounts are genuine. Most NDE authors are sincere. Many are brothers and sisters whose work the Holy Spirit has used to strengthen the Church. Pick up Piper. Pick up Burke. Pick up Miller. Read them as you would read a letter from an old friend who had a hard night and woke to find Jesus in the room. Receive what they offer. Test what they say. And then, when you have tested it, keep what is good.
In the next chapter we will turn to a harder task — evaluating NDE authors whose teaching departs from biblical Christianity in substantial ways. That chapter is necessary, but it is not the first word or the last word on this literature. The first and last word is the one we have been saying all along: most NDEs are genuine, most experiencers are sincere, and the Church has been blessed by this body of testimony more than it has been misled by it. The gifts are real, and we are allowed to receive them.
We began this chapter in a bookstore, with a friend paralyzed between a dozen titles. I hope we have helped her, and you, to stand in front of that shelf with a different posture: not paralyzed, not paranoid, not naively accepting, but genuinely discerning. You now have seven criteria for evaluating any NDE author. You have specific names to look for: Piper, Neal, Storm, McCormack, Braxton, Woodford, Tuttle, Kay on the experiencer side; Miller, Tabatt, Sabom, Burke, Habermas, Moreland, Rawlings on the research side. You have a five-practice posture for reading: open Bible, biblical testing, no idolizing, humility about mistakes, primary allegiance to Scripture. And you have a suggested reading plan if you want to build your own library.
The trustworthy authors in this chapter are a gift. Christians can read them with confidence, share them with others, and use them in ministry. Not every NDE book is corrupt. In fact, most of them are not. Many are gifts of God to His Church — quiet confirmations that the hope we proclaim is not a fiction, that the heaven we preach is real, that the Jesus we love has not abandoned His people at the edge of death. He meets them there. Sometimes, by His kindness, He sends them back with stories to tell. We are allowed to listen. We are allowed to be glad.
In the next chapter, we will face a harder conversation — the NDE authors whose teaching has drifted far from biblical Christianity, and how to engage their work responsibly. But we come to that chapter with our feet under us, because we have spent this chapter remembering that the drift is not the whole story. The Spirit has given us many faithful witnesses. He has also given us the wisdom to tell the difference. That is all we have ever needed.
Braxton, Dean. In Heaven! Experiencing the Throne of God. Chambersburg, PA: Divine Design Publishing, 2012.
Burke, John. Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God's Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2015.
Burpo, Todd, with Lynn Vincent. Heaven Is for Real: A Little Boy's Astounding Story of His Trip to Heaven and Back. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2010.
Cooper, John W. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000.
Farris, Joshua R. An Introduction to Theological Anthropology: Humans, Both Creaturely and Divine. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2020.
Habermas, Gary R., and J. P. Moreland. Beyond Death: Exploring the Evidence for Immortality. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1998.
Kay, Randy, and Shaun Tabatt. Near Death Experiences: 101 Short Stories That Will Help You Understand Heaven, Hell, and the Afterlife. Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image, 2023.
Kay, Randy, and Shaun Tabatt. Stories of Heaven and the Afterlife. Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image, 2022.
Long, Jeffrey. God and the Afterlife: The Groundbreaking New Evidence for God and Near-Death Experience. New York: HarperOne, 2016.
Miller, J. Steve. Deathbed Experiences as Evidence for the Afterlife, Volume 1: A Groundbreaking, Scientific Apologetic. Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2021.
Miller, J. Steve. Is Christianity Compatible with Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? The Surprising Presence of Jesus, Scarcity of Anti-Christian Elements, and Compatibility with Historic Christian Teachings. Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2023.
Neal, Mary C. To Heaven and Back: A Doctor's Extraordinary Account of Her Death, Heaven, Angels, and Life Again — A True Story. Colorado Springs, CO: WaterBrook, 2012.
Neal, Mary C. 7 Lessons from Heaven: How Dying Taught Me to Live a Joy-Filled Life. Colorado Springs, CO: Convergent Books, 2017.
Piper, Don, and Cecil Murphey. 90 Minutes in Heaven: A True Story of Death and Life. Grand Rapids, MI: Revell, 2004.
Rawlings, Maurice. Beyond Death's Door. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1978.
Rawlings, Maurice. To Hell and Back: Life After Death — Startling New Evidence. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1993.
Ritchie, George G., with Elizabeth Sherrill. Return from Tomorrow. Grand Rapids, MI: Chosen Books, 1978.
Sabom, Michael. Light and Death: One Doctor's Fascinating Account of Near-Death Experiences. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1998.
Storm, Howard. My Descent into Death: A Second Chance at Life. New York: Doubleday, 2005.
Tabatt, Shaun. The NDE Conspiracy. Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image, 2025.
Tuttle, Ivan. Heaven — Hell — Angels: A Near-Death Experience. Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image, 2020.
Wilkinson, Michael A. Crowned with Glory and Honor: A Chalcedonian Anthropology. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022.
Woodford, Jim, with Thom Gardner. Heaven, an Unexpected Journey: One Man's Experience with Heaven, Angels, and the Afterlife. Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image, 2017.